Cited by 142Data-Driven Disease SurveillanceSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Machine Learning to Detect Self-Reporting of Symptoms, Testing Access, and Recovery Associated With COVID-19 on Twitter: Retrospective Big Data Infoveillance Study

Open access
Mackey, Tim, Purushothaman, Vidya, Li, Jiawei, Shah, Neal, Nali, Matthew, Bardier, Cortni, Liang, Bryan, Cai, Mingxiang +1 more·2020·JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is a global health emergency with over 6 million cases worldwide as of the beginning of June 2020. The pandemic is historic in scope and precedent given its emergence in an increasingly digital era. Importantly, there have been concerns about the accuracy of COVID-19 case counts due to issues such as lack of access to testing and difficulty in measuring recoveries. Objective: The aims of this study were to detect and characterize user-generated conversations that could be associated with COVID-19-related symptoms, experiences with access to testing, and mentions of disease recovery using an unsupervised machine learning approach. Methods: Tweets were collected from the Twitter public streaming application programming interface from March 3-20, 2020, filtered for general COVID-19-related keywords and then further filtered for terms that could be related to COVID-19 symptoms as self-reported by users. Tweets were analyzed using an unsupervised machine learning approach called the biterm topic model (BTM), where groups of tweets containing the same word-related themes were separated into topic clusters that included conversations about symptoms, testing, and recovery. Tweets in these clusters were then extracted and manually annotated for content analysis and assessed for their statistical and geographic characteristics. Results: A total of 4,492,954 tweets were collected that contained terms that could be related to COVID-19 symptoms. After using BTM to identify relevant topic clusters and removing duplicate tweets, we identified a total of 3465 (<1%) tweets that included user-generated conversations about experiences that users associated with possible COVID-19 symptoms and other disease experiences. These tweets were grouped into five main categories including first- and secondhand reports of symptoms, symptom reporting concurrent with lack of testing, discussion of recovery, confirmation of negative COVID-19 diagnosis after receiving testing, and users recalling symptoms and questioning whether they might have been previously infected with COVID-19. The co-occurrence of tweets for these themes was statistically significant for users reporting symptoms with a lack of testing and with a discussion of recovery. A total of 63% (n=1112) of the geotagged tweets were located in the United States. Conclusions: This study used unsupervised machine learning for the purposes of characterizing self-reporting of symptoms, experiences with testing, and mentions of recovery related to COVID-19. Many users reported symptoms they thought were related to COVID-19, but they were not able to get tested to confirm their concerns. In the absence of testing availability and confirmation, accurate case estimations for this period of the outbreak may never be known. Future studies should continue to explore the utility of infoveillance approaches to estimate COVID-19 disease severity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/19509

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By providing complementary evidence to observations by Mackey et al and Stokes et al on expressed mental health concerns during the crisis, our study further underscores their findings using a comparable control data set, reinforcing and providing empirical credibility to the impression that the COVID-19 pandemic has indeed caused or contributed directly to the mental health concerns that we描述.

    “By providing complementary evidence to observations by Mackey et al [106] and Stokes et al [107] on expressed (mental health) concerns during the crisis, our study further underscores their findings using a comparable (control) data set, reinforcing and providing empirical credibility to the impression that the COVID-19 pandemic has indeed caused or contributed directly to the mental health concer”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 142

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Kalyanam J Velupillai S Doan S Conway M Lanckriet G Facts and fabrications about Ebola: a Twitter based study arXiv 2015
  2. [29]Kulshrestha J Kooti F Nikravesh A Gummadi K Geographic dissection of the Twitter network 2012 Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media June 4–8, 2012 Dublin, Ireland

Authors
Mackey, T., Purushothaman, V., Li, J., Shah, N., Nali, M., Bardier, C., Liang, B., Cai, M., & Cuomo, R.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Mackey, Tim
Venue
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Published
2020-06-08
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
e19509
ISSN
2369-2960 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3032372024
Cited by
142
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 22
FWCI
22.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, Twitter, social media surveillance, self-reported symptoms, COVID-19 testing access, recovery from illness, biterm topic model, unsupervised topic modeling, user-generated content, geo-tagged tweets, COVID-19 case counts, United States
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Big Data, COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Retrospective Studies, Coronavirus Infections, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Self Report, Pandemics, Diagnostic Self Evaluation, Social Media, Public Health Surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review