The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification and Description of Balance, Mobility, and Gait Assessments Conducted via Telerehabilitation for Individuals With Neurological Conditions: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 global pandemic pushed many rehabilitation practitioners to pivot their in-person practice to adopt telerehabilitation as their main method of delivery. In addition to documenting information on interventions used with clients, it is best practice for therapists to use reliable and validated outcome measures to inform their interventions. Objective: Through this scoping review, we aim to identify (1) which outcomes are being used remotely to assess balance, mobility, and gait in patients with neurological conditions, and (2) what psychometric data (validity, reliability, etc.) for remotely administered outcomes are available. Methods: Three main concepts will be included in our search: (1) neurological conditions; (2) administration by telerehabilitation; and (3) outcome measures for balance, mobility, and gait. Studies reporting remote assessment of neurological conditions published since 1990 will be included. The database search will be completed in MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Gray literature including dissertations, conference papers, and protocol papers will also be sourced. Two reviewers will independently screen each title and abstract using pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Manuscripts that appear to meet the criteria will be subject to further review, and full-text extraction using a pre-piloted extraction sheet if all criteria are met. The data will be categorized by assessment types describing impairments (such as balance, strength, and mobility) or activity limitations or participation restriction (such as functional mobility, ambulatory functions, and activities of daily living). Results: This scoping review will document outcome measures currently used in the remote assessment of neurological conditions. To date, 235 titles and abstracts were screened. We are in the process of finalizing the full text screening for the inclusion of articles. We expect the full screening to be completed in November 2021 and data analysis in January 2022. Our results are expected to be published in early 2022. Conclusions: The optimal use of telerehabilitation as a mode to deliver rehabilitation intervention should be coupled with the completion of validated outcome measures. Therefore, it is crucial to further our knowledge on remote outcome measures and therapeutic assessments. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/27186
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., et al. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-0850 · Cited by 43,565
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-32 · Cited by 1,871
Remote Physical Activity Monitoring in Neurological Disease: A Systematic Review.
Block, V. A. J., Pitsch, E., Tahir, P., Cree, B. A. C., Allen, D. D., & Gelfand, J. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154335 · Cited by 198 · cited 1×
“The use of smartphone apps, accelerometers, and activity tracking devices to assess activity level and gait parameters in people living with impairments after stroke, brain injury, and multiple sclerosis also has been reported as remote assessment methods in recent reviews [21,22].”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Brennan, David M, 2009, Stud Health Technol Inform, 145, 231
- 10.2196/rehab.7511 · DOI
- 10.1682/JRRD.2014.02.0052 · DOI
- 10.1258/jtt.2008.080104 · DOI
- 10.2522/ptj.20160028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.013 · DOI
- 10.1177/1357633X15572201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3 · DOI
- 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000350 · DOI
- 10.46743/1540-580x/2018.1753 · DOI
- 10.1177/1357633X18792805 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.msard.2015.06.011 · DOI
- 10.1177/1357633x19850381 · DOI
- 10.1177/1357633X19845466 · DOI
- 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31821a24eb · DOI
- Finch, E, 2002, Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures: A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision Making
- Portney, LG, 2009, Foundations of Clinical Research: Application to Practice (3rd Edition)
- 10.1177/1357633X16642369 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458520946005 · DOI
- 10.1080/1364557032000119616 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05808-8 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Neil, J., Barnes, K., Morgan Donnelly, E., Sheehy, L., & Sveistrup, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Bruyère (CA)
- Venue
- JMIR Research Protocols
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2021-12-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e27186
- ISSN
- 1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8704120
- OpenAlex
- W3203533136
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Ottawa
- Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- telerehabilitation, neurological disorders, balance assessment, mobility assessment, gait analysis, psychometric properties, reliability and validity, COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine, activities of daily living, functional mobility
- MeSH terms
- Scoping Reviews As Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review