Cited by 9Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsPhysical Activity and Health

Automatic Recognition and Analysis of Balance Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Algorithm Validation

Open access
Hsu, Yu-Cheng, Wang, Hailiang, Zhao, Yang, Chen, Frank, Tsui, Kwok-Leung·2021·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Clinical mobility and balance assessments identify older adults who have a high risk of falls in clinics. In the past two decades, sensors have been a popular supplement to mobility and balance assessment to provide quantitative information and a cost-effective solution in the community environment. Nonetheless, the current sensor-based balance assessment relies on manual observation or motion-specific features to identify motions of research interest. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop an automatic motion data analytics framework using signal data collected from an inertial sensor for balance activity analysis in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: In total, 59 community-dwelling older adults (19 males and 40 females; mean age = 81.86 years, SD 6.95 years) were recruited in this study. Data were collected using a body-worn inertial measurement unit (including an accelerometer and a gyroscope) at the L4 vertebra of each individual. After data preprocessing and motion detection via a convolutional long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network, a one-class support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and k-nearest neighborhood (k-NN) were adopted to classify high-risk individuals. Results: The framework developed in this study yielded mean accuracies of 87%, 86%, and 89% in detecting sit-to-stand, turning 360°, and stand-to-sit motions, respectively. The balance assessment classification showed accuracies of 90%, 92%, and 86% in classifying abnormal sit-to-stand, turning 360°, and stand-to-sit motions, respectively, using Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment-Balance (POMA-B) criteria by the one-class SVM and k-NN. Conclusions: The sensor-based approach presented in this study provided a time-effective manner with less human efforts to identify and preprocess the inertial signal and thus enabled an efficient balance assessment tool for medical professionals. In the long run, the approach may offer a flexible solution to relieve the community’s burden of continuous health monitoring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/30135

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hsu, Y.-C., Wang, H., Zhao, Y., Chen, F., & Tsui, K.-L.
Affiliations
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Yang
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2021-12-20
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
e30135
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200379997
Cited by
9
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • City University of Hong Kong (9610406)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71901188)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
balance assessment, community-dwelling older adults, inertial measurement unit, wearable sensors, fall risk, sit-to-stand, turning motion, motion detection, convolutional LSTM, one-class support vector machine, fall risk classification, health monitoring
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Assessment, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review