Examining TikTok’s Potential for Community-Engaged Digital Knowledge Mobilization With Equity-Seeking Groups
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Social media is increasingly being leveraged by researchers to engage in public debates and rapidly disseminate research results to health care providers, health care users, policy makers, educators, and the general public. This paper contributes to the growing literature on the use of social media for digital knowledge mobilization, drawing particular attention to TikTok and its unique potential for collaborative knowledge mobilization with underserved communities who experience barriers to health care and health inequities (eg, equity-seeking groups). Setting the TikTok platform apart from other social media are the unique audiovisual video editing tools, together with an impactful algorithm, that make knowledge dissemination and exchange with large global audiences possible. As an example, we will discuss digital knowledge mobilization with trans and nonbinary (trans) communities, a population that experiences barriers to health care and is engaged in significant peer-to-peer health information sharing on the web. To demonstrate, analytics data from 13 selected TikTok videos on the topic of research on gender-affirming medicine (eg, hormonal therapy and surgeries) are presented to illustrate how knowledge is disseminated within the trans community via TikTok. Considerations for researchers planning to use TikTok for digital knowledge mobilization and other related community engagement with equity-seeking groups are also discussed. These include the limitations of TikTok analytics data for measuring knowledge mobilization, population-specific concerns related to community safety on social media, the spread of disinformation, barriers to internet access, and commercialization and intellectual property issues. This paper concludes that TikTok is an innovative social media platform that presents possibilities for achieving transformative, community-engaged knowledge mobilization among researchers, underserved health care users, and their health care providers, all of whom are necessary to achieve better health care and population health outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Over recent years, TikTok has exhibited a surge in contents regarding mental illness, body positivity, neurodiversity, and gender identity.
“Over recent years, TikTok has exhibited a surge in contents regarding mental illness, body positivity, neurodiversity, and gender identity [38, 39].”
From Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health (2025) · cites this paper as [39]
The Community-Engaged Knowledge Mobilization and Trans Peer-to-Peer Information Sharing section describes TikTok content about trans identity and gender-affirming care. It does not document a surge over time or establish a comparable increase in content about mental illness, body positivity, or neurodiversity. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 87
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [50]Andalibi N Lacombe-Duncan A Roosevelt L Giniel C Wojciechowski K LGBTQ persons? use of online spaces to navigate conception, pregnancy, and pregnancy loss: an intersectional approach Transact Comput-Hum Interact (TOCHI) 2021 In Press (forthcoming)
- Authors
- MacKinnon, K. R., Kia, H., & Lacombe-Duncan, A.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- MacKinnon, Kinnon Ross
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2021-12-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e30315
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8704107
- OpenAlex
- W3210688059
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- TikTok, community participation, social media health communication, health disparities, barriers to care, disinformation, internet access barriers, commercialization of research, intellectual property
- MeSH terms
- Disinformation, Health Inequities, Humans, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review