Cited by 18Foot and Ankle SurgeryLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Digital Rehabilitation for Acute Ankle Sprains: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

Open access
Correia, Fernando D, Molinos, Maria, Neves, Carlos, Janela, Dora, Carvalho, Diana, Luis, Sara, Francisco, Gerard E, Lains, Jorge +1 more·2021·JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are one of the most prevalent soft-tissue injuries worldwide. Physical therapy, especially progressive exercise, has proven effective in improving function, while preventing recurrence. OBJECTIVE: We aim to present the results of a fully remote and digitally guided rehabilitation program for acute ankle sprains. METHODS: We performed a prospective longitudinal cohort study of individuals eligible for workers' compensation, who were referred for digital rehabilitation therapy for a sprained ankle. Therapeutic exercise sessions were to be performed independently by the patient at home using the biofeedback device provided by SWORD Health. Primary endpoints were the change in self-reported Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-activities of daily living (FAAM-ADL) and FAAM-Sports scores. Participants were assessed at baseline, end of the program, and 6 months after program completion. Secondary outcomes included digital therapy dosage, pain and fatigue during sessions, and satisfaction. RESULTS: In total, 93 (89.4%) patients completed the program and 79 (76.0%) were available for follow-up. Changes in the primary outcomes between baseline and the 6-month follow-up were both significant (P<.001) and clinically meaningful: mean difference of -2.72 points (95% CI -3.31 to -2.13) on the NPRS (49.8% reduction), 21.7 points (95% CI 17.13-26.27) on the FAAM-ADL (41.1% increase), and 37.8 points (95% CI 30.45-45.15) on the FAAM-Sports (151.8% increase). Longer waiting periods between the accident date and treatment initiation were found to negatively impact functional status at baseline and at the end of the program, triggering an extension in the program duration. The total training volume (12.5 hours, SD 10.5 hours) was similar to that of other interventions for ankle sprains, but the dosage per week was much higher (2.4 hours per week, SD 0.87 hours per week). The mean patient satisfaction score was 8.8 (SD 1.57) out of 10. Among program completers, 83.9% attained full recovery and were discharged with no residual disability. CONCLUSIONS: Being far less demanding in terms of human resources, the digital program presented constituted a viable, clinically effective, and convenient solution for ankle sprain rehabilitation, particularly during the pandemic. This is the first study presenting a fully remote home-based rehabilitation program for acute ankle sprains, with patients achieving sustained long-term results. This was a prospective cohort study and, as such, did not include a control group, but the results appear comparable to those published for face-to-face interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04819022; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04819022.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/31247

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors have previously demonstrated the utility of a completely remote digital care program integrating exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy in several MSK conditions, including for upper limb.

    “Previously, we have demonstrated the utility of a completely remote digital care program (DCP) integrating exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in several MSK conditions [42,43,44,45], including for upper limb [46,47,48].”

    From Digital Rehabilitation for Elbow Pain Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study (2022) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Methods (Rehabilitation Program; page not provided) describe home-based therapeutic exercise, and the Discussion (Conclusions; page not provided) reports meaningful improvement from a fully remote program for acute ankle sprains. Our copy does not establish that this program integrated education or CBT. The citing sentence assigns upper-limb conditions to separate citations [46–48], rather than to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 18

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [46]Luís S Adaptação e validação da Foot and Ankle Ability Measure para a população portuguesa Coimbra Health School 2017 2021-09-15 http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/18541

Authors
Correia, F. D., Molinos, M., Neves, C., Janela, D., Carvalho, D., Luis, S., Francisco, G. E., Lains, J., & Bento, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • Memorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Correia, Fernando D
Venue
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Published
2021-09-30
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
e31247
ISSN
2369-2529 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3191626590
Cited by
18
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Estudo Geral (Universidad de Coimbra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
acute ankle sprain, digital rehabilitation, remote physical therapy, biofeedback, home-based exercise, workers' compensation, analgesia, functional recovery, treatment dosage, patient satisfaction, soft tissue injury, return to work, residual disability, recurrence prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review