The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geographical Disparities in Pooled Stroke Incidence and Case Fatality in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macao: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Geographical variations in stroke incidence and case fatality in China have been reported. Nonetheless, pooled estimates in major Chinese regions are unknown. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate pooled estimates of incidence and short-term case fatality of stroke in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macao. Methods: Longitudinal studies published in English and indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science, or in Chinese and indexed in SinoMed and CQVIP will be targeted. Articles reporting on adults living in China who experience first-ever stroke or die within 1 year from newly onset stroke will be included. The 95% confidence intervals of the event will be estimated using the exact method based on the Poisson distribution. The log incidence rates together with their corresponding log standard errors will be meta-analyzed using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. Pooled case fatality rates will also be estimated using a random effect model. Time trends in pooled age-standardized stroke incidence and case fatality will be estimated. The heterogeneity of the included studies will be measured using the I2 statistic and meta-regressions will be run to analyze the effect of reported covariates on found heterogeneity. Risk of bias will be examined using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Publication bias will be tested using funnel plots and Egger tests. Sensitivity analysis will be run by risk of bias. Results: This study was funded and registered in 2020. The systematic searches, study selections, and quality assessments were completed in July 2021. Data extraction and analysis and manuscript writing are scheduled to be completed by December 2021. Conclusions: This will be the first study to provide regional differences in pooled estimates of stroke incidence with case fatality in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macao. This study will assist in addressing inequalities in stroke care across China. Trial Registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020170724; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=170724 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/32566
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feigin, V. L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Krishnamurthi, R., Mensah, G. A., Connor, M., Bennett, D. A., Moran, A. E., Sacco, R. L., Anderson, L., Truelsen, T., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61953-4 · Cited by 3,899
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.018820 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30500-3 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025250 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004056 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61097-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/ijs.12322 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70004-2 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.cir.103.3.462 · DOI
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001238 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41569-018-0119-4 · DOI
- 10.1177/0300060516664241 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.STR.0000194955.34820.78 · DOI
- 10.1159/000077341 · DOI
- 10.1136/svn-2017-000098 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0092763 · DOI
- Aho, K, 1980, Bull World Health Organ, 58, 113
- Abu-Zidan, FM, 2012, Afr Health Sci, 12, 557
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829bfde3 · DOI
- PensonDFKrishnaswamiSJulesASeroogyJCMcPheetersMLEvaluation and Treatment of CryptorchidismComparative Effectiveness Reviews2012122020-12-01Agency for Healthcare Research and Qualityhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115847/
- 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0061665 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacl.2018.06.011 · DOI
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505305 · DOI
- 10.1212/wnl.35.12.1708 · DOI
- 10.1159/000110518 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12874-016-0145-z · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- He, F., Blackberry, I., Yao, L., Xie, H., & Mnatzaganian, G.
- Affiliations
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Kunming Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- He, Fan
- Venue
- JMIR Research Protocols
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2022-01-18
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e32566
- ISSN
- 1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8808348
- OpenAlex
- W4205535414
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- La Trobe University (cc-by)
- Funders
- La Trobe University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
- Keywords
- stroke incidence, stroke case fatality, geographic disparities, regional variation, China, Hong Kong, Macau, age-standardized incidence, temporal trends, health disparities, stroke care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review