Cited by 13Poxvirus research and outbreaksViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchVirology and Viral Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrated Network Analysis of Symptom Clusters Across Monkeypox Epidemics From 1970 to 2023: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The worldwide spread of monkeypox (mpox) has witnessed a significant increase, particularly in nonendemic countries. Objective: We aimed to investigate the changing clinical symptoms associated with mpox from 1970 to 2023 and explore their interrelations. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 3 electronic databases were searched for English peer-reviewed studies conducted from January 1970 to April 2023 that reported any symptoms among confirmed mpox cases. We categorized the mpox epidemics into 3 periods: 1970-2002 (period 1, within the African region), 2003-2021(period 2, epidemics outside Africa), and 2022-2023 (period 3, worldwide outbreak). Following PRISMA guidelines, a meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence for each symptom. The correlation among symptoms was analyzed and visualized using network analysis. Results: The meta-analysis included 61 studies that reported 21 symptoms in 720 patients from period 1, 39 symptoms in 1756 patients from period 2, and 37 symptoms in 12,277 patients from period 3. The most common symptom among patients from all 3 periods was rash (period 1: 92.6%, 95% CI 78.2%-100%; period 2: 100%, 95% CI 99.9%-100%; and period 3: 94.8%, 95% CI 90.9%-98.8%), followed by lymphadenopathy (period 1: 59.8%, 95% CI 50.3%-69.2%; period 2: 74.1%, 95% CI 64.2%-84.1%; and period 3: 61.1%, 95% CI 54.2%-68.1%). Fever (99%, 95% CI 97%-100%), enlarged lymph nodes (80.5%, 95% CI 75.4%-85.0%), and headache (69.1%, 95% CI 4%-100%) were the main symptoms in period 1, with a significant decrease in period 3: 37.9%, 31.2%, and 28.7%, respectively. Chills/rigors (73.3%, 95% CI 60.9%-85.7%), fatigue (68.2%, 95% CI 51.6%-84.8%), and dysphagia/swallowing difficulty (61.2%, 95% CI 10.5%-100%) emerged as primary new symptoms in period 2 and decreased significantly in period 3. Most other symptoms remained unchanged or decreased in period 3 compared to the former 2 periods. Nausea/vomiting had the highest degree of correlation (with 13 symptoms) and was highly positively correlated with lymphadenopathy (r=0.908) and conjunctivitis (r=0.900) in period 2. In contrast, rash and headache were 2 symptoms with the highest degree of correlation (with 21 and 21 symptoms, respectively) in period 3 and were highly positively correlated with fever (r=0.918 and 0.789, respectively). Conclusions: The manifestation of symptoms in patients with mpox has become more diverse, leading to an increase in their correlation. Although the prevalence of rash remains steady, other symptoms have decreased. It is necessary to surveil the evolving nature of mpox and the consequential changes in clinical characteristics. Epidemic countries may shift their focus on the potential association among symptoms and the high synergy risk. Trial Registration: PROSPERO Registration: CRD42023403282; http://tinyurl.com/yruuas5n

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/49285

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Study selection flowchart.
Figure 1 Study selection flowchart.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of the prevalence of clinical symptoms among mpox patients from 1970 to 2002. mpox: monkeypox.
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of the prevalence of clinical symptoms among mpox patients from 1970 to 2002. mpox: monkeypox.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Meta-analysis of the prevalence of clinical symptoms among mpox patients from 2003 to 2021.
Figure 3 Meta-analysis of the prevalence of clinical symptoms among mpox patients from 2003 to 2021.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Meta-analysis of the prevalence of clinical symptoms among mpox patients from 2022 to 2023. mpox: monkeypox.
Figure 4 Meta-analysis of the prevalence of clinical symptoms among mpox patients from 2022 to 2023. mpox: monkeypox.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Meta-analysis of the prevalence of clinical symptoms among mpox patients from 1970 to 2023. mpox: monkeypox.
Figure 5 Meta-analysis of the prevalence of clinical symptoms among mpox patients from 1970 to 2023. mpox: monkeypox.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Network diagram of clinical symptoms among mpox patients in (A) 2003-2021, (B) 2022-2023, and (C) 1970-2023. mpox: monkeypox.
Figure 6 Network diagram of clinical symptoms among mpox patients in (A) 2003-2021, (B) 2022-2023, and (C) 1970-2023. mpox: monkeypox.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010141 · DOI
  2. 10.1086/498155 · DOI
  3. 10.1186/s12941-022-00527-1 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00856-9 · DOI
  5. 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009838 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2919-2921.2002 · DOI
  7. Moore, M, 2023, Mpox (Monkeypox)
  8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02187-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.add4507 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.imj.2022.07.001 · DOI
  11. 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00241 · DOI
  12. 10.3390/tropicalmed1010008 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.idc.2019.03.001 · DOI
  14. 10.3390/pathogens12010146 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/rmv.2446 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/jmv.28709 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101817 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/infdis/jiad034 · DOI
  19. 10.3390/biomedicines11030957 · DOI
  20. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1099/vir.0.81215-0 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/tmi.13785 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.add4153 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.2220415120 · DOI
  25. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007791 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/all.15633 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.08.013 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/cid/ciaa143 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101710 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/rmv.2426 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Su, S., Jia, M., Yu, Y., Li, H., Yin, W., Lu, Y., Huang, R., Xiang, R., Huang, H., & Hu, P.
Affiliations
Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Hu, Peng
Venue
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Published
2024-02-16
Volume
10
Pages
e49285
ISSN
2369-2960 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391885025
Cited by
13
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Chongqing Medical University
  • Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTB2023NSCQ)
  • Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Poxvirus research and outbreaks
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
monkeypox, symptom clusters, clinical symptoms, symptom prevalence, rash, lymphadenopathy, fever, headache, symptom interrelationships
MeSH terms
Humans, Mpox, Monkeypox, Epidemics, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated Network Analysis of Symptom Clusters Across Monkeypox Epidemics From 1970 to 2023: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2196/49285
The paper
Su, S., Jia, M., Yu, Y., Li, H., Yin, W., Lu, Y., Huang, R., Xiang, R., Huang, H., & Hu, P. (2024). Integrated Network Analysis of Symptom Clusters Across Monkeypox Epidemics From 1970 to 2023: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. https://doi.org/10.2196/49285