Cited by 9Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Adapting a Telehealth Physical Activity and Diet Intervention to a Co-Designed Website for Self-Management After Stroke: Tutorial

Open access
Pogrebnoy, Dina, Ashton, Lee, Beh, Brian A, Burke, Meredith, Cullen, Richard, Czerenkowski, Jude, Davey, Julie, Dennett, Amy M +11 more·2024·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

People who experience a stroke are at a higher risk of recurrent stroke when compared with people who have not had a stroke. Addressing modifiable risk factors like physical inactivity and poor diet has been shown to improve blood pressure, a leading contributor to stroke. However, survivors of stroke often experience challenges with accessing risk reduction services including long wait lists, difficulty with transportation, fatigue, impaired function, and diminished exercise capacity. Providing health interventions via a website can extend the reach when compared with programs that are only offered face to face or via real-time telehealth. Given global challenges of accessing secondary prevention programs, it is important to consider alternative ways that this information can be made available to survivors of stroke worldwide. Using the “design thinking” framework and drawing on principles of the integrated knowledge translation approach, we adapted 2 co-designed telehealth programs called i-REBOUND – Let’s get moving (physical activity intervention) and i-REBOUND – Eat for health (diet Intervention) to create the i-REBOUND after stroke website. The aim of this paper is to describe the systematic process undertaken to adapt resources from the telehealth delivered i-REBOUND – Let’s get moving and i-REBOUND – Eat for health programs to a website prototype with a focus on navigation requirements and accessibility for survivors of stroke. We engaged a variety of key stakeholders with diverse skills and expertise in areas of stroke recovery, research, and digital health. We established a governance structure, formed a consumer advisory group, appointed a diverse project team, and agreed on scope of the project. Our process of adaptation had the following 3 phases: (1) understand, (2) explore, (3) materialize. Our approach considered the survivor of stroke at the center of all decisions, which helped establish guiding principles related to our prototype design. Careful and iterative engagement with survivors of stroke together with the application of design thinking principles allowed us to establish the functional requirements for our website prototype. Through user testing, we were able to confirm the technical requirements needed to build an accessible and easy-to-navigate website catering to the unique needs of survivors of stroke. We describe the process of adapting existing content and co-creating new digital content in partnership with, and featuring, people who have lived experience of stroke. In this paper, we provide a road map for the steps taken to adapt resources from 2 telehealth-delivered programs to a website format that meets specific navigation and accessibility needs of survivors of stroke.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/58419

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Pogrebnoy, D., Ashton, L., Beh, B. A., Burke, M., Cullen, R., Czerenkowski, J., Davey, J., Dennett, A. M., English, K., Godecke, E., Harper, N., Lynch, E., MacDonald-Wicks, L., Patterson, A., Ramage, E., Schelfhaut, B., Simpson, D. B., Zacharia, K., & English, C.
Affiliations
  • Western Health (AU)
  • Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • National Stroke Foundation (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Pogrebnoy, Dina
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2024-10-22
Volume
26
Pages
e58419
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401177316
Cited by
9
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
stroke survivors, secondary stroke prevention, telemedicine, physical activity interventions, dietary intervention, co-design, design thinking, knowledge translation, web accessibility, web navigation, user testing, stakeholder engagement, self-management, digital health
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Self-Management, Diet, Humans, Exercise, Telemedicine, Internet, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review