Machine learning–based prediction for high health care utilizers by using a multi-institutional diabetes registry: model training and evaluation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: The cost of health care in many countries is increasing rapidly. There is a growing interest in using machine learning for predicting high health care utilizers for population health initiatives. Previous studies have focused on individuals who contribute to the highest financial burden. However, this group is small and represents a limited opportunity for long-term cost reduction. Objective: We developed a collection of models that predict future health care utilization at various thresholds. Methods: We utilized data from a multi-institutional diabetes database from the year 2019 to develop binary classification models. These models predict health care utilization in the subsequent year across 6 different outcomes: patients having a length of stay of ≥7, ≥14, and ≥30 days and emergency department attendance of ≥3, ≥5, and ≥10 visits. To address class imbalance, random and synthetic minority oversampling techniques were employed. The models were then applied to unseen data from 2020 and 2021 to predict health care utilization in the following year. A portfolio of performance metrics, with priority on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and positive predictive value, was used for comparison. Explainability analyses were conducted on the best performing models. Results: When trained with random oversampling, 4 models, that is, logistic regression, multivariate adaptive regression splines, boosted trees, and multilayer perceptron consistently achieved high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (>0.80) and sensitivity (>0.60) across training-validation and test data sets. Correcting for class imbalance proved critical for model performance. Important predictors for all outcomes included age, number of emergency department visits in the present year, chronic kidney disease stage, inpatient bed days in the present year, and mean hemoglobin A1c levels. Explainability analyses using partial dependence plots demonstrated that for the best performing models, the learned patterns were consistent with real-world knowledge, thereby supporting the validity of the models. Conclusions: We successfully developed machine learning models capable of predicting high service level utilization with strong performance and valid explainability. These models can be integrated into wider diabetes-related population health initiatives.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches have demonstrated growing promise in diabetes risk prediction, complication detection and healthcare utilization forecasting.
“More recently, machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches have demonstrated growing promise in diabetes risk prediction, complication detection and healthcare utilization forecasting [21–28].”
From Machine learning-driven risk prediction for post-hospitalization diabetes case management: Integrating clinical and social determinants of health (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- [3]Osawa I Goto T Yamamoto Y Tsugawa Y Machine-learning-based prediction models for high-need high-cost patients using nationwide clinical and claims data NPJ Digit Med 2020 11 11 3 1 148 10.1038/s41746-020-00354-8 10.1038/s41746-020-00354-8 33299137 10.1038/s41746-020-00354-8 33299137 PMC7658979 · DOI · Paper page
- [4]Langenberger B Schulte T Groene O The application of machine learning to predict high-cost patients: A performance-comparison of different models using healthcare claims data PLoS One 2023 18 1 e0279540 10.1371/journal.pone.0279540 36652450 PONE-D-21-16427 36652450 PMC9847900 · DOI
- [5]Das L Abramson E Kaushal R High-need, high-cost patients offer solutions for improving their care and reducing costs NEJM Catalyst 2019 02 05 2023-10-23 https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.19.0015 · DOI
- [7]Wodchis WP Austin PC Henry DA A 3-year study of high-cost users of health care CMAJ 2016 02 16 188 3 182 188 10.1503/cmaj.150064 26755672 cmaj.150064 26755672 PMC4754179 · DOI
- [8]Ng SH Rahman N Ang IYH Sridharan S Ramachandran S Wang DD Tan CS Toh S Tan XQ Characterization of high healthcare utilizer groups using administrative data from an electronic medical record database BMC Health Serv Res 2019 07 05 19 1 452 10.1186/s12913-019-4239-2 31277649 10.1186/s12913-019-4239-2 31277649 PMC6612067 · DOI
- [9]de Ruijter UW Kaplan ZLR Bramer WM Eijkenaar F Nieboer D van der Heide A Lingsma HF Bax WA Prediction models for future high-need high-cost healthcare use: a systematic review J Gen Intern Med 2022 05 37 7 1763 1770 10.1007/s11606-021-07333-z 35018571 10.1007/s11606-021-07333-z 35018571 PMC9130365 · DOI
- [10]Lim DYZ Chia SY Abdul Kadir H Mohamed Salim NN Bee YM Establishment of the SingHealth Diabetes Registry CLEP 2021 03 Volume 13 215 223 10.2147/clep.s300663 PMC7982443 33762850 · DOI
- [11]Shannon B Pang R Jepson M Williams C Andrew N Smith K Bowles K What is the prevalence of frequent attendance to emergency departments and what is the impact on emergency department utilisation? A systematic review and meta-analysis Intern Emerg Med 2020 10 15 7 1303 1316 10.1007/s11739-020-02403-2 32557095 10.1007/s11739-020-02403-2 32557095 · DOI
- [12]Tan JK Salim NNM Lim GH Chia SY Thumboo J Bee YM Trends in diabetes-related complications in Singapore, 2013-2020: A registry-based study PLoS One 2022 17 10 e0275920 10.1371/journal.pone.0275920 36219616 PONE-D-22-22825 36219616 PMC9553054 · DOI
- [14]Leevy JL Khoshgoftaar TM Bauder RA Seliya N A survey on addressing high-class imbalance in big data J Big Data 2018 11 1 5 1 1 30 10.1186/s40537-018-0151-6 · DOI
- [15]Chawla NV Bowyer KW Hall LO Kegelmeyer WP SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2002 06 01 16 321 357 10.1613/jair.953 · DOI · Paper page
- [17]Fernández A del Río S Chawla NV Herrera F An insight into imbalanced big data classification: outcomes and challenges Complex Intell Syst 2017 3 1 3 2 105 120 10.1007/s40747-017-0037-9 · DOI
- [19]Ozenne B Subtil F Maucort-Boulch D The precision--recall curve overcame the optimism of the receiver operating characteristic curve in rare diseases J Clin Epidemiol 2015 08 68 8 855 9 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.010 25881487 S0895-4356(15)00106-7 25881487 · DOI · Paper page
- [23]Tan JK Lim GH Mohamed Salim NN Chia SY Thumboo J Bee YM Associations between mean HbA1c, HbA1c variability, and both mortality and macrovascular complications in patients with diabetes mellitus: a registry-based cohort study Clin Epidemiol 2023 15 137 149 10.2147/CLEP.S391749 36721457 391749 36721457 PMC9884453 · DOI
- [24]Klement W El Emam K Consolidated reporting guidelines for prognostic and diagnostic machine learning modeling studies: development and validation J Med Internet Res 2023 08 31 25 e48763 10.2196/48763 37651179 v25i1e48763 37651179 PMC10502599 · DOI
- [28]Nghiem N Atkinson J Nguyen BP Tran-Duy A Wilson N Predicting high health-cost users among people with cardiovascular disease using machine learning and nationwide linked social administrative datasets Health Econ Rev 2023 02 04 13 1 9 10.1186/s13561-023-00422-1 36738348 10.1186/s13561-023-00422-1 36738348 PMC9898915 · DOI
- [29]Desai RJ Wang SV Vaduganathan M Evers T Schneeweiss S Comparison of machine learning methods with traditional models for use of administrative claims with electronic medical records to predict heart failure outcomes JAMA Netw Open 2020 01 03 3 1 e1918962 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962 31922560 2758475 31922560 PMC6991258 · DOI
- [30]Tan JK Kadir HA Lim GH Thumboo J Bee YM Lim CC Trends in fluid overload-related hospitalisations among patients with diabetes mellitus The impact of chronic kidney disease Ann Acad Med Singap 2024 07 30 53 7 435 445 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2024136 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2024136 39132960 39132960 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, S.-Y., Saleem, M., Land, A. M., DeLaney, E. W., Garretson, A. R., Patel, M., Hall, A. G., Westrick, S., Ovalle, F., Cherrington, A. L., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106604
- Authors
- Tan, J. K., Quan, L., Salim, N. N. M., Tan, J. H., Goh, S.-Y., Thumboo, J., & Bee, Y. M.
- Affiliations
- Singapore General Hospital (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Tan, Joshua Kuan
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR AI
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2024-10-17
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- e58463
- ISSN
- 2817-1705 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11528163
- OpenAlex
- W4401843999
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR AI (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- diabetes mellitus, high utilizers, length of hospital stay, emergency department visits, class imbalance, oversampling, explainability, partial dependence plots, population health, chronic kidney disease, HbA1c, cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review