Cited by 6Mental Health via WritingDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Unraveling Online Mental Health Through the Lens of Early Maladaptive Schemas: AI-Enabled Content Analysis of Online Mental Health Communities

Open access
Ang, Beng Heng, Gollapalli, Sujatha Das, Du, Mingzhe, Ng, See-Kiong·2025·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

Background: Early maladaptive schemas (EMSs) are pervasive, self-defeating patterns of thoughts and emotions underlying most mental health problems and are central in schema therapy. However, the characteristics of EMSs vary across demographics, and despite the growing use of online mental health communities (OMHCs), how EMSs manifest in these online support-seeking environments remains unclear. Understanding these characteristics could inform the design of more effective interventions powered by artificial intelligence to address online support seekers’ unique therapeutic needs. Objective: We aimed to uncover associations between EMSs and mental health problems within OMHCs and examine features of EMSs as they are reflected in OMHCs. Methods: We curated a dataset of 29,329 posts from widely accessed OMHCs, labeling each with relevant schemas and mental health problems. To identify associations, we conducted chi-square tests of independence and calculated odds ratios (ORs) with the dataset. In addition, we developed a novel group-level case conceptualization technique, leveraging GPT-4 to extract features of EMSs from OMHC texts across key schema therapy dimensions, such as schema triggers and coping responses. Results: Several associations were identified between EMSs and mental health problems, reflecting how EMSs manifest in online support-seeking contexts. Anxiety-related problems typically highlighted vulnerability to harm or illness (OR 5.64, 95% CI 5.34-5.96; P<.001), while depression-related problems emphasized unmet interpersonal needs, such as social isolation (OR 3.18, 95% CI 3.02-3.34; P<.001). Conversely, problems with eating disorders mostly exemplified negative self-perception and emotional inhibition (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.45-2.46; P<.001). Personality disorders reflected themes of subjugation (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.86-3.39; P<.001), while posttraumatic stress disorder problems involved distressing experiences and mistrust (OR 5.04, 95% CI 4.49-5.66; P<.001). Substance use disorder problems reflected negative self-perception of failure to achieve (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.35-2.49; P<.001). Depression, personality disorders, and posttraumatic stress disorder were also associated with 12, 9, and 7 EMSs, respectively, emphasizing their complexities and the need for more comprehensive interventions. In contrast, anxiety, eating disorder, and substance use disorder were related to only 2 to 3 EMSs, suggesting that these problems are better addressed through targeted interventions. In addition, the EMS features extracted from our dataset averaged 13.27 (SD 3.05) negative features per schema, with 2.65 (SD 1.07) features per dimension, as supported by existing literature. Conclusions: We uncovered various associations between EMSs and mental health problems among online support seekers, highlighting the prominence of specific EMSs in each problem and the unique complexities of each problem in terms of EMSs. We also identified EMS features as expressed by support seekers in OMHCs, reinforcing the relevance of EMSs in these online support-seeking contexts. These insights are valuable for understanding how EMS are characterized in OMHCs and can inform the development of more effective artificial intelligence–powered tools to enhance support on these platforms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/59524

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because underlying schema structures are recognized as contributing to psychological suffering, many therapeutic approaches target them to foster long-term change.

    “Because these underlying structures are recognized as contributing to psychological suffering, many therapeutic approaches target them to foster long-term change [10-13].”

    From Schema-Informed Digital Mental Health Intervention for Maladaptive Cognitive-Emotional Patterns: Randomized Controlled Trial (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction (Background; page not provided) describes early maladaptive schemas as associated with mental health problems and says that interventions addressing them can improve treatment outcomes. It identifies schema therapy, but does not establish that many therapeutic approaches target schemas or that doing so fosters long-term change. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 128 · Cited by 6

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [3]COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide World Health Organization 2022 3 2 2024-01-03 https://tinyurl.com/bdcykcjv PMC9998057 35414629
  2. [20]Janson DL Early maladaptive schemas in an Australian adult alcohol dependent clinical sample: differences between men and women Edith Cowan University 2015 2025-01-27 https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/1463/ 30422042
  3. [32]OpenAI GPT-4 technical report arXiv Preprint posted online on March 15, 2023
  4. [84]Bekker MH Spoor ST Vingerhoets AJ Nyklíček I Denollet J Emotional inhibition, health, gender, and eating disorders: the role of (over) sensitivity to others Emotion Regulation 2008 Boston, MA Springer
  5. [93]Bachner-Melman R Oakley B Knafo A Madhavan G Wilson DS The relevance of pathological altruism to eating disorders Pathological Altruism 2012 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press

Authors
Ang, B. H., Gollapalli, S. D., Du, M., & Ng, S.-K.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Ang, Beng Heng
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2025-02-07
Volume
27
Pages
e59524
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407242105
Cited by
6
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation Singapore (AISG-GC-2019-001, AISG-GC-2019-001-2B)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
early maladaptive schemas, online mental health communities, schema therapy, mental illness, anxiety, depression, eating disorders, personality disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, substance use disorders, coping responses, GPT-4, online text analysis, social isolation, distrust, negative self-concept, emotional inhibition, subjugation, digital mental health interventions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Artificial Intelligence, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review