Using Smartphone Technology to Monitor Physical Activity in the 10,000 Steps Program: A Matched Case–Control Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Website-delivered physical activity interventions are successful in producing short-term behavior change. However, problems with engagement and retention of participants in these programs prevent long-term behavior change. New ways of accessing online content (eg, via smartphones) may enhance engagement in these interventions, which in turn may improve the effectiveness of the programs. OBJECTIVE: To measure the potential of a newly developed smartphone application to improve health behaviors in existing members of a website-delivered physical activity program (10,000 Steps, Australia). The aims of the study were to (1) examine the effect of the smartphone application on self-monitoring and self-reported physical activity levels, (2) measure the perceived usefulness and usability of the application, and (3) examine the relationship between the perceived usefulness and usability of the application and its actual use. METHODS: All participants were existing members of the 10,000 Steps program. We recruited the intervention group (n = 50) via email and instructed them to install the application on their smartphone and use it for 3 months. Participants in this group were able to log their steps by using either the smartphone application or the 10,000 Steps website. Following the study, the intervention group completed an online questionnaire assessing perceived usability and usefulness of the smartphone application. We selected control group participants (n = 150), matched for age, gender, level of self-monitoring, preintervention physical activity level, and length of membership in the 10,000 Steps program, after the intervention was completed. We collected website and smartphone usage statistics during the entire intervention period. RESULTS: Over the study period (90 days), the intervention group logged steps on an average of 62 days, compared with 41 days in the matched group. Intervention participants used the application 71.22% (2210/3103) of the time to log their steps. Logistic regression analyses revealed that use of the application was associated with an increased likelihood to log steps daily during the intervention period compared with those not using the application (odds ratio 3.56, 95% confidence interval 1.72-7.39). Additionally, use of the application was associated with an increased likelihood to log greater than 10,000 steps on each entry (odds ratio 20.64, 95% confidence interval 9.19-46.39). Linear regression analysis revealed a nonsignificant relationship between perceived usability (r = .216, P = .21) and usefulness (r = .229, P = .17) of the application and frequency of logging steps in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: Using a smartphone application as an additional delivery method to a website-delivered physical activity intervention may assist in maintaining participant engagement and behavior change. However, due to study design limitations, these outcomes should be interpreted with caution. More research, using larger samples and longer follow-up periods, is needed to replicate the findings of this study.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous examinations of hybrid interventions designed to promote self-monitoring of behavior have reported that app-based delivery was associated with better adherence to self-monitoring compared to Web-based formats.
“Previous examinations of hybrid interventions designed to promote self-monitoring of behavior have reported that app-based delivery was associated with better adherence to self-monitoring compared to Web-based formats [17,44].”
From Understanding Usage of a Hybrid Website and Smartphone App for Weight Management: A Mixed-Methods Study (2014) · cites this paper as [44]
Unlike the interventions provided by Carter et al and Kirwan et al, self-monitoring was not the only technique promoted by the POWeR intervention.
“Unlike the interventions provided by Carter et al [17] and Kirwan et al [44], self-monitoring was not the only technique promoted by the POWeR intervention.”
From Understanding Usage of a Hybrid Website and Smartphone App for Weight Management: A Mixed-Methods Study (2014) · cites this paper as [44]
Previous research reveals positive usage and views of app-based self-monitoring interventions.
“This contrasts with previous research revealing positive usage and views of app-based self-monitoring interventions [16,17,44]”
From Understanding Usage of a Hybrid Website and Smartphone App for Weight Management: A Mixed-Methods Study (2014) · cites this paper as [44]
Ratings of perceived usefulness and ease of use were not strongly associated with increased use of an app-based step logging tool.
“For example, ratings of perceived usefulness and ease of use were not strongly associated with increased use of an app-based step logging tool [44].”
From Understanding Usage of a Hybrid Website and Smartphone App for Weight Management: A Mixed-Methods Study (2014) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 189
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [23]research2guidance The Impact Of Smartphone Applications On The Mobile Health Industry (Vol. 2) 2012 1 09 2012-03-28 Mobile Health Market Report 2011-2016 http://www.research2guidance.com/shop/index.php/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/160/
- [28]Thatte G Li M Lee S Emken A Narayanan S Mitra U Spruijt-Metz D Annavaram M KNOWME: an energy-efficient, multimodal body area network for physical activity monitoring ACM Trans Embed Comput Syst 2010
- Authors
- Kirwan, M., Duncan, M. J., Vandelanotte, C., & Mummery, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Central Queensland University (AU)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Kirwan, Morwenna
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2012-04-20
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e55
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3376516
- OpenAlex
- W2017848404
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 36.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Queensland Health
- National Heart Foundation of Australia (PH 07B 3303, 07B 3303)
- Central Queensland University
- Queensland Government
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- mobile application, physical activity monitoring, self-monitoring, step counting, perceived usefulness, perceived usability, online health interventions, participant engagement, retention, mobile health, behavior change, app usage behavior, Canada
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Motor Activity, Health Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Cell Phone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review