Motivational Interviewing in a Web-Based Physical Activity Intervention With an Avatar: Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Developing Web-based physical activity (PA) interventions based on motivational interviewing (MI) could increase the availability and reach of MI techniques for PA promotion. Integrating an avatar in such an intervention could lead to more positive appreciation and higher efficacy of the intervention, compared to an intervention that is purely text-based. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to determine whether a Web-based PA intervention based on MI with an avatar results in more positive appreciation and higher effectiveness of the intervention, when compared to an intervention that is purely text-based. METHODS: A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted, containing the following research conditions: (1) a Web-based PA intervention based on MI with an avatar, (2) a content-identical intervention without an avatar, and (3) a control condition that received no intervention. Measurements included PA behavior and process variables, measured at baseline, directly following the intervention and 1 month post intervention. RESULTS: Both interventions significantly increased self-reported PA at 1 month, compared to the control condition (beta(AVATARvsCONTROL)=.39, P=.011; beta(TEXTvsCONTROL)=.44, P=.006). No distinctions were found regarding intervention effect on PA between both interventions. Similarly, the results of the process evaluation did not indicate any significant differences between both interventions. Due to the limited relational skills of the avatar in this study, it probably did not succeed in forming a stronger relationship with the user, over and above text alone. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that avatars that do not strengthen the social relationship with the user do not enhance the intervention impact. Future research should determine whether Web-based PA interventions based on MI could benefit from inclusion of a virtual coach capable of more complex relational skills than used in the current study, such as responding in gesture to the user's state and input. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register trial number: NTR3147; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3147 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6NCbwdUJX).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Feedback from users in 5 studies expressed a preference for interactivity; users in 1 study liked the interactivity of the chatbot, and users in 4 studies desired greater interactivity or relational skills.
“Feedback from users in 5 studies expressed a preference for interactivity, with users in 1 study noting that they liked the interactivity of the chatbot [35,37], and users in the other 4 studies expressed a desire for greater interactivity or relational skills in the conversational agent [14,32,34,53].”
From The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Friederichs, S., Bolman, C., Oenema, A., Guyaux, J., & Lechner, L.
- Affiliations
- Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Friederichs, Stijn
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2014-02-13
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e48
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3936285
- OpenAlex
- W1976639658
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- ZonMw (200120007)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- motivational interviewing, online intervention, physical activity promotion, avatars, virtual coach, text-based interventions, social relationship, process evaluation, physical activity behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, User-Computer Interface, Exercise, Internet, Young Adult, Self Report, Motivational Interviewing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review