Cited by 30Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Barriers and Facilitators When Implementing Web-Based Disease Monitoring and Management as a Substitution for Regular Outpatient Care in Pediatric Asthma: Qualitative Survey Study

Open access
van den Wijngaart, Lara S, Geense, Wytske W, Boehmer, Annemie LM, Brouwer, Marianne L, Hugen, Cindy AC, van Ewijk, Bart E, Koenen-Jacobs, Marie-José, Landstra, Anneke M +8 more·2018·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite their potential benefits, many electronic health (eHealth) innovations evaluated in major studies fail to integrate into organizational routines, and the implementation of these innovations remains problematic. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe health care professionals' self-identified perceived barriers and facilitators for the implementation of a Web-based portal to monitor asthmatic children as a substitution for routine outpatient care. Also, we assessed patients' (or their parents) satisfaction with this eHealth innovation. METHODS: Between April and November 2015, we recruited 76 health care professionals (from 14 hospitals). During a period of 6 months, participants received 3 questionnaires to identify factors that facilitated or impeded the use of this eHealth innovation. Questionnaires for patients (or parents) were completed after the 6-month virtual asthma clinic (VAC) implementation period. RESULTS: Major perceived barriers included concerns about the lack of structural financial reimbursement for Web-based monitoring, lack of integration of this eHealth innovation with electronic medical records, the burden of Web-based portal use on clinician workload, and altered patient-professional relationship (due to fewer face-to-face contacts). Major perceived facilitators included enthusiastic and active initiators, a positive attitude of professionals toward eHealth, the possibility to tailor care to individual patients ("personalized eHealth"), easily deliverable care according to current guidelines using the VAC, and long-term profit and efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of Web-based disease monitoring and management in children is complex and dynamic and is influenced by multiple factors at the levels of the innovation itself, individual professionals, patients, social context, organizational context, and economic and political context. Understanding and defining the barriers and facilitators that influence the context is crucial for the successful implementation and sustainability of eHealth innovations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.9245

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 30

Authors
van den Wijngaart, L. S., Geense, W. W., Boehmer, A. L., Brouwer, M. L., Hugen, C. A., van Ewijk, B. E., Koenen-Jacobs, M.-J., Landstra, A. M., Niers, L. E., van Onzenoort-Bokken, L., Ottink, M. D., Rikkers-Mutsaerts, E. R., Groothuis, I., Vaessen-Verberne, A. A., Roukema, J., & Merkus, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Maasstad Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Rijnstate Hospital (NL)
  • Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL)
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Haga Hospital (NL)
  • Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL)
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2018-10-30
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
e284
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809186946
Cited by
30
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw (430000012)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
childhood asthma, eHealth implementation, implementation barriers and facilitators, healthcare professionals' perceptions, patient satisfaction, electronic health record integration, clinician workload, patient-professional relationship
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Asthma, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telemedicine, Internet, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review