Cited by 26Digital Mental Health InterventionsStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Treat Emotional Distress After Stroke: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Simblett, Sara K, Yates, Matthew, Wagner, Adam P, Watson, Peter, Gracey, Fergus, Ring, Howard, Bateman, Andrew·2017·JMIR Mental Health

Abstract

Background: Depression and anxiety are common complications following stroke. Symptoms could be treatable with psychological therapy, but there is little research on its efficacy. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate (1) the acceptability and feasibility of computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) to treat symptoms of depression and anxiety and (2) a trial design for comparing the efficacy of cCBT compared with an active comparator. Methods: Of the total 134 people screened for symptoms of depression and anxiety following stroke, 28 were cluster randomized in blocks with an allocation ratio 2:1 to cCBT (n=19) or an active comparator of computerized cognitive remediation therapy (cCRT, n=9). Qualitative and quantitative feedback was sought on the acceptability and feasibility of both interventions, alongside measuring levels of depression, anxiety, and activities of daily living before, immediately after, and 3 months post treatment. Results: Both cCBT and cCRT groups were rated as near equally useful (mean = 6.4 vs 6.5, d=0.05), while cCBT was somewhat less relevant (mean = 5.5 vs 6.5, d=0.45) but somewhat easier to use (mean = 7.0 vs 6.3, d=0.31). Participants tolerated randomization and dropout rates were comparable with similar trials, with only 3 participants discontinuing due to potential adverse effects; however, dropout was higher from the cCBT arm (7/19, 37% vs 1/9, 11% for cCRT). The trial design required small alterations and highlighted that future-related studies should control for participants receiving antidepressant medication, which significantly differed between groups (P=.05). Descriptive statistics of the proposed outcome measures and qualitative feedback about the cCBT intervention are reported. Conclusions: A pragmatic approach is required to deliver computerized interventions to accommodate individual needs. We report a preliminary investigation to inform the development of a full randomized controlled trial for testing the efficacy of computerized interventions for people with long-term neurological conditions such as stroke and conclude that this is a potentially promising way of improving accessibility of psychological support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mental.6022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 26

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]Simblett S Craven J Mercer J Gracey F Ring H Bateman A Beating the blues after a stroke: a case presentation 2011 BABCP 39th Annual Conference and Workshops July 20-23, 2011 Guildford, London 53
  2. [38]Du E Quayle E Macleod H Service providers' perceptions on the uptake of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy (CCBT) PsychNology Journal 2013 11 3 213 33

Authors
Simblett, S. K., Yates, M., Wagner, A. P., Watson, P., Gracey, F., Ring, H., & Bateman, A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Simblett, Sara K
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2017-05-31
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
e16
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2617039529
Cited by
26
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • King's College London
  • Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
computerized cognitive behavioral therapy, stroke, post-stroke depression, post-stroke anxiety, emotional distress, feasibility, acceptability, dropout, antidepressants, activities of daily living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review