Cited by 60Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Mobile Mindfulness Intervention on an Acute Psychiatric Unit: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

Open access
Mistler, Lisa A, Ben-Zeev, Dror, Carpenter-Song, Elizabeth, Brunette, Mary F, Friedman, Matthew J·2017·JMIR Mental Health

Abstract

Background: Aggression and violence on acute psychiatric inpatient units is extensive and leads to negative sequelae for staff and patients. With increasingly acute inpatient milieus due to shorter lengths of stay, inpatient staff is limited in training and time to be able to provide treatments. Mobile technology provides a new platform for offering treatment on such units, but it has not been tested for feasibility or usability in this particular setting. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of a brief mindfulness meditation mobile phone app intended to reduce anger and aggression in acute psychiatric inpatients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder, and a history of violence. Methods: Participants were recruited between November 1, 2015 and June 1, 2016. A total of 13 inpatients at an acute care state hospital carried mobile phones for 1 week and were asked to try a commercially available mindfulness app called Headspace. The participants completed a usability questionnaire and engaged in a qualitative interview upon completion of the 7 days. In addition, measures of mindfulness, state and trait anger, and cognitive ability were administered before and after the intervention. Results: Of the 13 enrolled participants, 10 used the app for the 7 days of the study and completed all measures. Two additional participants used the app for fewer than 7 days and completed all measures. All participants found the app to be engaging and easy to use. Most (10/12, 83%) felt comfortable using Headspace and 83% (10/12) would recommend it to others. All participants made some effort to try the app, with 6 participants (6/12, 50%) completing the first 10 10-minute “foundation” guided meditations. Conclusions: This is the first known study of the use of a commercially available app as an intervention on acute psychiatric inpatient units. Acutely ill psychiatric inpatients at a state hospital found the Headspace app easy to use, were able to complete a series of meditations, and felt the app helped with anxiety, sleep, and boredom on the unit. There were no instances of an increase in psychotic symptoms reported and there were no episodes of aggression or violence noted in the record.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mental.7717

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only one qualitative study of the Headspace app included people with a BD diagnosis.

    “Only one qualitative study of the Headspace app included people with a BD diagnosis (Mistler et al. 2017).”

    From Evaluating the quality, safety, and functionality of commonly used smartphone apps for bipolar disorder mood and sleep self-management (2022) · cites this paper as Mistler et al. 2017

    Methods > Quantitative Data Collection says the Headspace study used qualitative methods, and Methods > Participants lists bipolar disorder among eligible diagnoses. The passages do not establish that a person with bipolar disorder was in the final sample, or that this was the only such qualitative study. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • While some of the outcomes assessed are directly relevant to BD (e.g., mood and sleep quality), many of the studies measured variables related to general wellbeing, such as mindfulness, stress, and attention, and only one qualitative study included people with BD.

    “Finally, while some of the outcomes assessed are directly relevant to BD (e.g., mood and sleep quality), many of the studies measured variables related to general wellbeing, such as mindfulness, stress, and attention, and only one qualitative study included people with BD (Mistler et al. 2017).”
  • MM can improve anger and aggression in acute patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder.

    “Preliminary studies have suggested that MM can improve anger and aggression in acute patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder.68”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 60

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [38]Krueger R Casey M Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research, 5th edition 2104 11 30 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications 1 280
  2. [53]Rubin J Chisnell D Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design and conduct effective tests 2008 5 12 Indianapolis, IN John Wiley and Sons

Authors
Mistler, L. A., Ben-Zeev, D., Carpenter-Song, E., Brunette, M. F., & Friedman, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Mistler, Lisa A
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2017-08-21
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
e34
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2750343062
Cited by
60
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
acute psychiatric inpatients, violence and aggression, anger reduction, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, feasibility and acceptability, usability, guided meditation, mobile health apps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review