The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) provides a reliable method to assess the quality of mobile health (mHealth) apps. However, training and expertise in mHealth and the relevant health field is required to administer it. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the development and reliability testing of an end-user version of the MARS (uMARS). METHODS: The MARS was simplified and piloted with 13 young people to create the uMARS. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the uMARS was then examined in a second sample of 164 young people participating in a randomized controlled trial of a mHealth app. App ratings were collected using the uMARS at 1-, 3,- and 6-month follow up. RESULTS: The uMARS had excellent internal consistency (alpha = .90), with high individual alphas for all subscales. The total score and subscales had good test-retest reliability over both 1-2 months and 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The uMARS is a simple tool that can be reliably used by end-users to assess the quality of mHealth apps.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the uMARS total score and subscales were shown as excellent in the RCT (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90) (46).”
From Improving mental well-being in psychocardiology—a feasibility trial for a non-blended web application as a brief metacognitive-based intervention in cardiovascular disease patients (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Overall, the uMARS demonstrates good internal reliability (α = 0.90), and the subscales demonstrate moderate reliability (α = 0.71 and 0.80) (Stoyanov et al., 2016).”
From Pilot study of a well-being app to support New Zealand young people during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as Stoyanov et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The usability and acceptability of the technology were assessed using qualitative methods and standard measures, such as the survey based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology [27], the Mobile Application Rating Scale [28], and the System Usability and After-Scenario Questionnaire [29].”
From Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with digital mental health interventions: Systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Both MARS and uMARS included some usability components such as engagement, functionality, and information quality; however, they were not specifically designed to study usability with end users.”
From The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Shortly thereafter, a simpler user version of MARS (uMARS) was created for the general population for the same purpose [37].”
From The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532 · cited 1×
“Interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) [16-18] were used, as they provide weighted values of rater agreement and assess proximity rather than equality of ratings.”
Flesch, R. (1948) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057532 · Cited by 5,391 · cited 1×
“Readability of the MARS and the draft uMARS was then determined using the Flesch Reading Ease test [12,13], which has a score range of 0-100, with higher scores indicating easier readability.”
QUANTIFYING TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY USING THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AND THE SEM
Weir, J. P. (2005) · The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/15184.1 · Cited by 4,864 · cited 1×
“Interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) [16-18] were used, as they provide weighted values of rater agreement and assess proximity rather than equality of ratings.”
Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial
Hallgren, K. A. (2012) · Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023 · Cited by 3,884 · cited 3×
“The uMARS total score demonstrated good [16] levels of ICC of .”
Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, Jr., Robert P., R., Richard L., C., & Brad, S. (1975) · doi:10.21236/ada006655 · Cited by 3,497
Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps
Stoyanov, S. R., Hides, L., Kavanagh, D. J., Zelenko, O., Tjondronegoro, D., & Mani, M. (2015) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3422 · Cited by 2,233 · cited 2×
“In response to these issues, we developed the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) to provide researchers, professionals, and clinicians with a brief tool for classifying and assessing the quality of mHealth apps [11].”
Self-citationFree, C., Phillips, G., Watson, L., Galli, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., Patel, V., & Haines, A. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363 · Cited by 1,187
Andersson, G., Cuijpers, P., Carlbring, P., Riper, H., & Hedman, E. (2014) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20151 · Cited by 1,077 · cited 1×
“There are currently more than 165,000 mHealth apps (free and paid) publicly available [1], yet the accuracy of the health information contained in these apps is not scrutinized by regulatory bodies [2], which could compromise user health and safety [3-5].”
Mapping mHealth research: a decade of evolution
Fiordelli, M., Diviani, N., & Schulz, P. J. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2430 · Cited by 570 · cited 1×
“While meta-analytic studies have demonstrated the efficacy of mHealth apps targeting physical activity and weight loss [6,7], the evidence base for other types of mHealth apps is poor at best [8-10].”
Review and evaluation of mindfulness-based iPhone apps
Mani, M., Kavanagh, D. J., Hides, L., & Stoyanov, S. R. (2015) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.4328 · Cited by 495
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- SuWA preliminary survey of knowledge discovery on smartphone applications (apps): Principles, techniques and research directions for e-healtharXiv preprint arXiv20140626International Conference on Complex Medical EngineeringJune 26-29, 2014Taipei, Taiwan14077314
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 870
Applying a multi-level usability framework for evaluation of a pregnancy health promotion app
Asadollahi, F., Zagami, S. E., Eslami, S., Tara, F., & Roudsari, R. L. (2026) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-026-03406-3 · Cited by 1
“Following the pilot period, participants completed the user Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS), a validated instrument with high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.90) and good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.70) [24].”
InfluentialDege, T., Ullmann, A., Glatzel, C. M., Fleißner, J., Borst, V., Strunz, P., Schmalzing, M., Goebeler, M., & Schmieder, A. (2026) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/73019 · Cited by 1
“A user version (uMARS) allows app quality to be assessed from the patient perspective [16].”
Quayle, E., Schwannauer, M., Varese, F., & Bucci, S. (2026) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2025.2540969 · Cited by 1
Nicoletti, A. E., Tonelli, M., Purin, B., & Rizzi, S. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16040585 · Cited by 1
Evaluation of Smartphone Applications for Dental Trauma Management
Gurharikar, A. S., Nagpal, D. I., Quais, S. M., Rewatkar, G., & Rathi, M. (2026) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/edt.70088 · Cited by 1
Nataletti, S., Banerjee, A., Prokup, S., Jayaraman, A., & Wong, A. (2026) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/84316 · Cited by 1
“We defined a score of 4 or higher as a benchmark for high acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and quality [28,30].”
Borst, V., Riedmann, A., Dege, T., Müller, K., Schmieder, A., Lugrin, B., & Kounev, S. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3810243 · Cited by 1
The Good, the Bad, and the Potential
Militello, L. K., & Hutson, E. (2022) · Advances in Family Practice Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.yfpn.2021.12.011 · Cited by 1
Android-Based Elderly Health App Analysis in Indonesia
Augia, T., & Dahlan, H. (2022) · JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi) · doi:10.35957/jatisi.v9i4.2882 · Cited by 1
Yokomitsu, K., Takashina, H. N., Takebayashi, Y., & Muranaka, S. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/44469 · Cited by 1
“Multiple scales and frameworks have been developed to evaluate mHealth apps [17,18].”
Refinement of Health App Review Tool (HART) through stakeholder interviews: HART 2.0
Faieta, J. M., Bourassa, J., & Best, K. L. (2023) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2023.2213742 · Cited by 2
Satisfaction of older adults with health applications: vINCI case study
Băjenaru, L., Balog, A., Tomescu, M., & Drăghici, R. (2023) · International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science · doi:10.1109/cscs59211.2023.00101 · Cited by 1
A web-based care assistant for caregivers of the elderly: Development and pilot study
Jeon, H., Choi, Y. S., & Lim, Y. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231200976 · Cited by 1
Mobile Technologies for Monitoring Sleep Time: A Systematic Search of App Stores in Brazil
Lemes, L. C., Triches, M. I., Carvalho, C., Cardoso, V. D. F., & Sato, T. D. O. (2024) · Sleep Science · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1779606 · Cited by 1
Li, H., Yang, S., Chi, H., Xu, L., Zhang, T., Bao, F., Stone, W. S., & Wang, J. (2024) · Exploration of Digital Health Technologies · doi:10.37349/edht.2024.00007 · Cited by 1
A Content and Quality Evaluation of Mobile Classroom Behavior Management Applications
Mittiga, S. R., Freeman, N. C., Furlonger, B., Chan, P., & Leif, E. (2024) · Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions · doi:10.1177/10983007241230594 · Cited by 1
“The first author employed the validated uMARS (Stoyanov et al., 2016) to assess and rate the quality of the included mCBM apps.”
InfluentialHealth App Review Tool (HART): Content validation through expert panel review
Moon, S., Best, K. L., Choi, Y. K., & Faieta, J. M. (2024) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2024.2337857 · Cited by 1
“…such as the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), the Users Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS), and the System Usability Scale (SUS) among others, they do not appraise the needs, preferences, and supports of the anticipated user (Affairs AS for P, 2013; Stoyanov et al., 2016; Terhorst et al., 2020).”
Accuracy of Dental Symptom Checker Web Application in the Singapore Military Population
Lim, S. N., Woon, X. R., Goh, C. E., Ng, J. C., Ang, S. Y., Lim, T. J., & Allen, P. (2024) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.006 · Cited by 1
“…study participants were asked to complete an online survey to subjectively evaluate engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality modified based on the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale, which was introduced and validated by Stoyanov et al 34 prior to discharge.”
Miller, M. J., Eberhart, L. G., Heliste, J. L., & Tripuraneni, B. R. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/59831 · Cited by 1
MacIsaac, A., Mann, V., Toombs, E., SCHMIDT, F. H., Olthuis, J. V., Stewart, S. H., Newton, A. S., Öhinmaa, A., & Mushquash, A. R. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08424-y · Cited by 2
“The UMARS demonstrates high internal consistency and acceptable test–retest reliability [39].”
Shin, N., & Yoo, H. J. (2024) · The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000001164 · Cited by 1
Morales, C. D., Hueros, A. M. D., Merino-Godoy, M.-D.-L.-Á., & Vélez, S. C. (2025) · Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED) · doi:10.6018/red.632871 · Cited by 1
Yismaw, G., Azage, M., Kebebaw, T., Hinyard, L., Gizaw, A., Mequanint, A., Hendrix, C., & Abate, G. (2025) · Journal of Migration and Health · doi:10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100304 · Cited by 1
“…(entertainment, customization), functionality (ease of use, navigation), aesthetics (layout, graphics, visual appeal), and information (quality, quantity) (Stoyanov et al., 2016). uMARS was assessed on 8 lab personnel from 2 VL testing centers using standard questionnaire (supplementary Table 2).”
Grenyer, B. F. S., Day, N. J. S., Denmeade, G., Ciarla, A., Davy, K., Reis, S. L., & Townsend, M. L. (2025) · Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation · doi:10.1186/s40479-025-00281-8 · Cited by 3
“Sixteen questions were modified from the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS; Stoyanov et al., [43] to assess participants’ experience and satisfaction with the online format of the intervention (e.g., “Is the online intervention content (visuals, language, design)…”
Halicki‐Asakawa, A., Mocci, J., & Libben, M. R. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/66298 · Cited by 1
“Quantitative measures of feasibility and acceptability of the MI-Coach: ED app were assessed using an adapted version of the TAM Questionnaire [31] and the user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS) [51].”
Chen, T. H., & Ma, W. (2025) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.70064 · Cited by 1
Ristow, N., Wilke, A., Skudlik, C., John, S. M., & Ludewig, M. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/66791 · Cited by 1
“Among them, the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) is a well-known and reliable instrument that measures the UX of health apps from the user’s perspective [47].”
Lee, G., & Shin, Y. (2025) · Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · doi:10.4040/jkan.24128 · Cited by 1
Shetty, V. B., Lim, R., Teo, S. Y. M., Soon, W. H. K., Roby, H. C., Roberts, A., Smith, G. J., Fournier, P. A., Jones, T. W., & Davis, E. A. (2025) · JMIR Diabetes · doi:10.2196/68694 · Cited by 1
“…or treated hypoglycemia during the subsequent 24 hours after exercise [1], overall perceived quality of acT1ve as measured by the uMARS questionnaire [26], changes in exercise patterns (ie, exercise frequency, duration, and intensity), and qualitative feedback relating to user experience of acT1ve.”
InfluentialWie gut sind Gesundheits-Apps?
Krämer, U. (2018) · ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt · doi:10.1055/s-0043-124562 · Cited by 1
Perle, J. G. (2019) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-019-00101-1 · Cited by 1
Santesteban‐Echarri, O., Tang, J., Shakeel, M. K., Fernandes, J., & Addington, J. (2020) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.04.003 · Cited by 1
Mustaffa, N. A., Yusoff, M. F., Rofie, M. K., Bakar, J. A. A., Mat, R. C., & Abidin, N. A. Z. (2020) · International Conference on Interactive Digital Media (ICIDM) · doi:10.1109/icidm51048.2020.9339606 · Cited by 2
“There are extensive literatures and researches have been documented for guiding developers in developing a quality mobile apps in learning, health and many more [9][12][13].”
Quality Evaluation of Fine Dust Management Mobile Applications
Lee, J. B., & Woo, H. (2021) · Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics · doi:10.21032/jhis.2021.46.1.110 · Cited by 1
Identifying Key Quality Features of mHealth Applications
Armas, R., Montenegro, C., Larco, A., & Yanez, C. (2022) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6309-3_2 · Cited by 1
Bregenzer, A., & Jiménez, P. (2018) · Springer Reference Wirtschaft · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-17975-5_30-1 · Cited by 1
Bregenzer, A., & Jiménez, P. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-17782-9_30 · Cited by 1
(2017) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/2_iis_2017_182-195 · Cited by 1
Application Progress of Smart Phone Applications in Continuous Care of Stroke Patients
Ying Yang1, H. G. (2023) · Academic Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences · doi:10.25236/ajmhs.2023.040511 · Cited by 1
E-mindful health: Evaluation of mobile apps for mindfulness
Mani, M. (2017) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.102651 · Cited by 2
THU0447 HOME-MONITORING GOUT FLARES WITH A SMARTPHONE APP – RESULTS OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY
Pouls, B. P. H., Bekker, C. L., van den Bemt, B. J. F., Gaffo, A., & Flendrie, M. (2020) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.3643 · Cited by 1
Albrecht, U., Malinka, C., Long, S., Raupach, T., Hasenfuss, G. P., & von Jan, U. (2019) · doi:10.2196/preprints.13375 · Cited by 1
User experience Design and Evaluation of mHealth Apps (Preprint)Preprint
Kim, G., Kim, H. K., & Hwang, D. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.44163 · Cited by 1
Lake, E., Bramble, J. C. T., Greenberg, H., Shipman, J. P., Marcus, R. L., Wasden, C. L., & Jones, K. B. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-102258-0.00010-0
EVALUATION OF MOBILE DENTAL APPLICATIONS USING USER VERSION MOBILE APP RATING SCALE (uMARS)
Thampy, P., Nijesh, J. E., Chaly, P. E., Shyam, S., & Vaishnavi, S. (2020) · Journal of Indian Dental Association Madras · doi:10.37841/jidam_2020_v7_i1_02
YILDIRIM, Y. O., & Bayraktar, A. (2021) · Öneri Dergisi · doi:10.14783/maruoneri.804134
A Data Analytics Strategy to Identify mHealth Apps Quality Improvements. A Case Study
Montenegro, C., Armas, R., Larco, A., & Yanez, C. (2021) · International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (ICMHI) · doi:10.1145/3472813.3473209
A feature assessment of smartphone applications providing menus
Horiuchi, Y., & Kato, T. (2021) · Journal for the Integrated Study of Dietary Habits · doi:10.2740/jisdh.32.2_87
Villalobos, J. P., Bull, S. S., & Portz, J. D. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.35592
Karagulle, M.-U., Lehmann, N. J., Muth, L. R., Hintze, C., Juritz, M.-A., Stegemann, L., Gersch, M., Voisard, A., & Fluhr, J. W. (2022) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.477
Based on WeChat Small Procedures County-Level Fresh Shopping Supermarket Operation Analysis
Duan, R. (2021) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-0115-6_113
Netter, A.-L., Beintner, I., & Brakemeier, E. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.35482
mHealth in the wild: A global examination of a publicly available app for depression (Preprint)Preprint
Su, L., & Anderson, P. L. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.35538
Lambrecht, A., Vuillerme, N., Raab, C., Simón, D., Meßner, E.-M., Hagen, M., Bayat, S., Kleyer, A., Aubourg, T., Schett, G. A., et al. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.30324
Bregenzer, A., & Jiménez, P. (2020) · Springer Reference Wirtschaft · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-17975-5_30-2
Dambi, J. M., Norman, C., Doukani, A., Potgieter, S., Turner, J., Musesengwa, R., Verhey, R., & Chibanda, D. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.37968
Lanssens, D., Thijs, I. M. V., Dreesen, P., Hecke, A. V., Coorevits, P. L., Gaethofs, G., Derycke, J., & Tency, I. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.37866
Agbadjé, T. T., Pilon, C., Bérubé, P., Forest, J., Rousseau, F., Rahimi, S. A., Giguère, Y., & Légaré, F. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.35381
Shi, Z.-X., Lee, Y., Chang, P., Hou, Z.-M., Liu, J., Tu, M.-H., Wen, T.-N., Cui, Y., Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2019) · doi:10.2196/preprints.13838
Bardus, M., Hamadeh, G., Hayek, B., & Kherfan, R. A. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.9793.a
Zhao, Q. S., Chen, P., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., & Li, X. (2020) · doi:10.2196/preprints.22474
LeBeau, K., Huey, L. G., & Hart, M. W. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.13019
Moore, K., Dettman, S. J., Choo, D., & Daniel Capurro, N. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.30036
Yu, H. X., Tan, L., Teng, Y., Xu, Z., Xiao, K., Yin, J. Y., Zuo, Y., Zhu, T., & Deng, X. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.33986
Self-Care Oriented Smartphone Apps for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review (Preprint)Preprint
Gosak, L., Fijačko, N., Ooge, J., Kamenšek, J., Debeljak, N., Verbert, K., & Štiglic, G. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.32207
Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. E., & Lintunen, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.047
Zhang, W., Zhang, K., Li, F., Ni, Y., Xie, F. X., Wang, J., & Li, Y. (2020) · doi:10.2196/preprints.26735
The functionality and quality of nutrition-related mobile applications in China (Preprint)Preprint
Li, Y., Ding, J., Wang, Y., Tang, C., & Zhang, P. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.13261
Saeidnia, H. R., Kozak, M., Ausloos, M., Herţeliu, C., Mohammadzadeh, Z., Ghorbi, A., Karajizadeh, M., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.39718
Vitger, T., Hjorthøj, C. R., Austin, S. F., Petersen, L., Tønder, E. S., Nordentoft, M., & Korsbek, L. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.40292
Rosenfeld, E. A., Lyman, C., & Roberts, J. E. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.40045
Kosasih, F. R., Yee, V. T. S., Toh, S. H. Y., & Sündermann, O. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.07.25.22278034
Groß, G., Lull, C., von Ahnen, J. A., Olsavszky, V., Knitza, J., Schmieder, A., & Leipe, J. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.39781
Moore, H. (2022) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.235040
Song, K. (2022) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.235039
Hinojosa-Nogueira, D., Ortiz-Viso, B., Navajas-Porras, B., Pérez-Burillo, S., González-Vigil, V., Pastoriza, S., & Rufián‐Henares, J. Á. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.44431
Özdamlı, F., Ababneh, M. A.-K., Karagözlü, D., & Aljarrah, A. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11234023
Advancements in Health Care Communication
Yang, A., & Lebedoff, S. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12063-3_8
Wegrzyk, J., Hyvärinen, M., de Labrusse, C., & Schläppy, F. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06137-0_11
Therapeutic Gaming for Adolescent Anxiety
Barnes, S., & Prescott, J. (2022) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-7589-8.ch037
Positive addiction recovery for an online audience: implementation design and user evaluation
Ogilvie, L., & Prescott, J. (2023) · Mental Health and Social Inclusion · doi:10.1108/mhsi-11-2022-0072
Shin, H., Lee, S., Lee, C., Kwon, M., Lee, J., & Lee, S. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.46238
Online Consumer Tools and Support
Kuhn, E. R., Reger, G. M., & Gratzer, D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42825-9_149-1
Niemann, A., Hüer, T., Neumann, A., Wasem, J., Schnell‐Inderst, P., & Neusser, S. (2023) · PubMed Central · doi:10.3205/000317
Cannabis and clinical high risk for psychosis: Monitoring and smartphones
Santesteban‐Echarri, O., Jalali, S., & Addington, J. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-89862-1.00011-8
Mobile Apps for Sepsis Self-Management: Systematic Review and Content Analysis (Preprint)Preprint
Zhou, Y., & Zeng, C. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.50578
Carvalho, L. R. B. D. A. (2023) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.5.2023.tde-04082023-161602 · Cited by 1
Garner, K., Thabrew, H., Lim, D. H., Hofman, P. L., Jefferies, C., & Serlachius, A. S. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.52364
Ergoterapide Mobil Sağlık Uygulamalarının Kullanımı
Yücel, H. (2023) · Avrasya Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.53493/avrasyasbd.1337736
A pragmatic approach to mobile attention bias modification in a clinical setting
Zhang, M. W. (2023) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/170488
Bhat, B., Nayak, P. P., Prabhakar, R. V., & Singhal, D. (2023) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.142038.1
“16,17 The MARS' applicability for quality assessment was proved by a validation study with metric evaluation.”
Breastfeeding mobile applications assistance in Brazil: a scoping review protocol
Leal, I. C., Gouvêa, E. F. G., Campos, L. M., de Oliveira, A. J. D., Teles, D. C. D. S., Silva, T. R. M., Barroso, J. M., Motta, A. R., & Furlan, R. M. M. M. (2023) · Revista CEFAC · doi:10.1590/1982-0216/20232569323
Shoucair, S., Downing, G. J., O’Rourke, J., Greenberg, L., Yea, M., Vatas, G., Kim, P., Fishbein, T., Unger, K. R., & Winslow, E. R. (2023) · BMC Digital Health · doi:10.1186/s44247-023-00049-6
Development and Validation of a Website on Early Childhood Nutrition
Esam, F. N., & Muniandy, N. D. (2024) · Jurnal Gizi dan Pangan · doi:10.25182/jgp.2024.19.supp.1.127-136
Addanki, S., Macedo, L. G., MacDermid, J. C., & Moll, S. E. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.57046
Implementing a mental health app library in primary care: A feasibility study
Lane, J., Manceau, L. M., de Chantal, P., Chagnon, A., Cardinal, M., Lauzier‐Jobin, F., & Lanoue, S. (2024) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102413 · Cited by 1
Tales From the Past: Adapting App Repositories to App Store Dynamics
Stach, M., Schickler, M., Reichert, M., & Pryss, R. C. (2023) · Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing (CSCE) · doi:10.1109/csce60160.2023.00225
“Such a centralized platform could also be used to unify ratings from different tools and languages (e.g., ENLIGHT [4], MARS [5]–[7] or AQUA [32]).”
Grieve, N. J., Braaten, K., MacPherson, M., Liu, S., & Jung, M. E. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.59386
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoyanov, S. R., Hides, L., Kavanagh, D. J., & Wilson, H.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hides, Leanne
- Venue
- JMIR mhealth and uhealth
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2016-06-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e72
- ISSN
- 2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4920963
- OpenAlex
- W2415928823
- Cited by
- 872
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 95 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 59.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
- Funders
- Queensland University of Technology
- Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Keywords
- Mobile App Rating Scale, Umar, mobile health apps, app quality assessment, youth, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, scale development, app ratings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review