Cited by 51Electronic Health Records SystemsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsClinical practice guidelines implementation

Development and Evaluation of a Mobile Decision Support System for Hypertension Management in the Primary Care Setting in Brazil: Mixed-Methods Field Study on Usability, Feasibility, and Utility

Open access
Silveira, Daniel Vitório, Marcolino, Milena Soriano, Machado, Elaine Leandro, Ferreira, Camila Gonçalves, Alkmim, Maria Beatriz Moreira, Resende, Elmiro Santos, Carvalho, Bárbara Couto, Antunes, André Pires +1 more·2019·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite being an important cardiovascular risk factor, hypertension has low control levels worldwide. Computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) might be effective in reducing blood pressure with a potential impact in reducing cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to evaluate the feasibility, usability, and utility of a CDSS, TeleHAS (tele-hipertensão arterial sistêmica, or arterial hypertension system), in the care of patients with hypertension in the context of a primary care setting in a middle-income country. METHODS: The TeleHAS app consists of a platform integrating clinical and laboratory data on a particular patient, from which it performs cardiovascular risk calculation and provides evidence-based recommendations derived from Brazilian and international guidelines for the management of hypertension and cardiovascular risk. Ten family physicians from different primary care units in the city of Montes Claros, Brazil, were randomly selected to use the CDSS for the care of hypertensive patients for 6 months. After 3 and 6 months, the feasibility, usability, and utility of the CDSS in the routine care of the health team was evaluated through a standardized questionnaire and semistructured interviews. RESULTS: Throughout the study, clinicians registered 535 patients with hypertension, at an average of 1.24 consultations per patient. Women accounted for 80% (8/10) of participant doctors, median age was 31.5 years (interquartile range 27 to 59 years). As for feasibility, 100% of medical users claimed it was possible to use the app in the primary care setting, and for 80% (8/10) of them it was easy to incorporate its use into the daily routine and home visits. Nevertheless, 70% (7/10) of physicians claimed that the time taken to fill out the CDSS causes significant delays in service. Clinicians evaluated TeleHAS as good (8/10, 80% of users), with easy completion and friendly interface (10/10, 100%) and the potential to improve patients' treatment (10/10, 100%). A total of 90% (9/10) of physicians had access to new knowledge about cardiovascular risk and hypertension through the app recommendations and found it useful to promote prevention and optimize treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a CDSS developed to assist the management of patients with hypertension was feasible in the context of a primary health care setting in a middle-income country, with good user satisfaction and the potential to improve adherence to evidence-based practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mhealth.9869

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 51

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Royal College of Physicians Hypertension: The Clinical Management of Primary Hypertension in Adults: Update of Clinical Guidelines 18 and 34 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2011 22855971 22855971

Authors
Silveira, D. V., Marcolino, M. S., Machado, E. L., Ferreira, C. G., Alkmim, M. B. M., Resende, E. S., Carvalho, B. C., Antunes, A. P., & Ribeiro, A. L. P.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2019-03-25
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
e9869
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903837644
Cited by
51
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository of Samara University (Samara National Research University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository of Samara University (Samara National Research University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
antihypertensive therapy, clinical decision support systems, mobile health apps, primary care, general practitioners, cardiovascular risk assessment, usability, feasibility, evidence-based recommendations, blood pressure control, middle-income countries, Brazil, Montes Claros, home visits, telemedicine, health information systems, implementation barriers, implementation facilitators, implementation research
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adult, Brazil, Decision Support Techniques, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Software Design, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review