The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing the Context of Support to Improve Outcomes of Internet-Based Self-help in Individuals With Depressive Symptoms: Protocol for a Randomized Factorial Trial (Preprint)
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.2196/21207 · Paper page
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Internet-based self-help interventions for individuals with depressive symptoms, in which the main component is often a web-based self-help program, have been shown to be efficacious in many controlled trials. However, there are also trials on self-help programs showing no significant effect when delivered in routine care, and some studies report high dropout and low adherence rates. Research suggests that these findings do not emerge primarily due to the specific content of a self-help program. It seems more important how a program is embedded in the context of human and automated support before and during the use of a self-help program. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to better understand the effects of 4 supportive contextual factors on outcomes of and adherence to a web-based self-help program for depressive symptoms. In a factorial experiment, 2 of 4 supportive factors, for which there is evidence for their role on outcomes and adherence, are realized during the intervention—personal guidance and automated email reminders. The other 2 factors are realized before the intervention—a diagnostic interview and a preintervention module aimed at increasing the motivation to use the program with motivational interviewing techniques. METHODS: The study is a full factorial randomized trial. Adults with mild to moderate depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire–9 score: 5-14) are recruited from the community through the internet and conventional media. All participants receive access to a web-based self-help program based on problem-solving therapy. They are randomized across 4 experimental factors, each reflecting the presence versus absence of a supportive factor (guidance, automated reminders, diagnostic interview, preintervention module) resulting in a 16-condition balanced factorial design. The primary outcome is depressive symptoms at 10 weeks post assessment. Secondary outcomes include adherence to the program, anxiety, stress, health-related quality of life, possible negative effects, and treatment satisfaction. Potential moderators and mediators (eg, treatment expectancy, problem-solving skills, working alliance with the study team) will also be investigated. RESULTS: Ethical approval was received on January 20, 2020. The study was initiated in February 2020, and 240 participants have been enrolled in the study as of November 1, 2020. Recruitment for a total of 255 participants is ongoing. Data collection is expected to be completed by May 2021. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of relevant supportive factors in the dissemination of web-based interventions is necessary to improve outcomes of and adherence to web-based self-help programs. This study may inform health care systems and guide decisions to optimize the implementation context of web-based self-help programs for depressive symptoms. CLINICALTRIAL: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04318236; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04318236 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT: DERR1-10.2196/21207
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-32 · Cited by 1,871
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08010126 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0706743719895342 · DOI
- 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.025106 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68770-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1176/foc.8.1.foc75 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00127-011-0355-y · DOI
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61414-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/16506070903318960 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0044 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.h5627 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/014466509X472138 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1352465812000501 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.invent.2014.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.brat.2010.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0062873 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143833 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/00048674.2010.493859 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12888-016-1054-8 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-0043-118335 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1055/s-0043-118335 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/jmir.1923 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1745-6215-10-59 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Bur, O. T., Krieger, T., Moritz, S., Klein, J. P., & Berger, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bur, Oliver Thomas
- Venue
- JMIR Research Protocols
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2020-09-17
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e21207-e21207
- ISSN
- 1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7886615
- OpenAlex
- W3117207675
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
- Funders
- University of Bern
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- online self-help, depressive symptoms, problem-solving therapy, individual guidance, motivational interviewing, diagnostic interview, medication adherence, dropout, mild to moderate depression, treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life, anxiety, stress, therapeutic relationship, treatment expectancy, problem-solving skills, community-based recruitment, factorial trial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review