PreprintCited by 2Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesReproductive Health and Contraception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stimulation Therapy to Induce Mothers: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Open access
Tortal, Danna, Shabanova, Veronika, Taylor, Sarah, Xu, Xiao, McAdow, Molly, Stetson, Bethany, McCollum, Sarah, Sanchez, Ester, Adjakple, Amie, Leventhal, Jessica, Son, Moeun·2024·JMIR Research Protocols

Preprint — published as 10.2196/63463 · Paper page

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than 1 million women have their labor induced in the United States each year, and synthetic oxytocin infusion is the most common method used. However, compared to spontaneous labor, medical induction is resource intensive, has increased obstetric risks, and is associated with less successful breastfeeding. In contrast to the endogenous oxytocin hormone, which is released in a pulsatile fashion in the brain, synthetic oxytocin is continuously infused intravenously, resulting in important limitations related to efficacy, safety, and cost. Akin to spontaneous labor contractions, infant suckling of the breast nipple is known to stimulate the pulsatile release of endogenous oxytocin from the posterior pituitary gland. Nipple stimulation therapy via an electric breast pump similarly stimulates endogenous oxytocin release and may be a favorable inpatient method for patients undergoing labor induction. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine whether inpatient nipple stimulation therapy is an efficacious labor induction method that increases the likelihood of spontaneous vaginal delivery and sustained breastfeeding and determine whether it is a cost-effective approach. METHODS: This is a multicenter, pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial of nulliparous patients with singleton gestations ≥36 weeks undergoing labor induction. This trial compares inpatient nipple stimulation therapy via an electric breast pump versus immediate synthetic oxytocin infusion without nipple stimulation. This trial including 988 nulliparas will provide adequate statistical power to detect clinically meaningful differences in delivery mode and breast milk as the sole source of nutrition for newborns at hospital discharge or 72 hours after birth. RESULTS: The project received pilot funding in 2021 and full funding in 2023. Enrollment for this study began in November 2021 at a single site, and as of May 2024, recruitment is underway at 3 study sites. It is anticipated that enrollment will be completed by late 2026. CONCLUSIONS: Successful completion of this trial will provide rigorous data to determine whether inpatient nipple stimulation therapy with an electric breast pump can improve the way we induce labor and positively impact breastfeeding success and early infant nutrition through lactation. CLINICALTRIAL: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05079841; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05079841 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT: DERR1-10.2196/63463

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/preprints.63463

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/s0002-9378(84)90355-7 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s40278-024-52928-0 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.010 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181961506 · DOI
  6. 10.1097/01.NMC.0000343859.62828.ee · DOI
  7. 10.1093/humupd/4.5.625 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00377-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.126 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/0269881112473788 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1152/ajpregu.00879.2005 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0002-9378(54)90261-6 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100575 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70544-9 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/ajcn/78.2.291 · DOI
  16. 10.1542/peds.2005-1629 · DOI
  17. 10.1542/peds.2006-2256 · DOI
  18. 10.1542/peds.2006-0780 · DOI
  19. 10.1001/archpsyc.65.5.578 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1089/bfm.2009.0050 · DOI
  21. 10.1186/1471-2393-12-36 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1542/peds.2011-3552 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1542/peds.2008-1315i · DOI
  24. 10.17269/cjph.105.4244 · DOI
  25. 10.1186/s13006-020-00310-y · DOI
  26. 10.1136/fn.88.6.f472 · DOI
  27. 10.1136/adc.2006.104331 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/0890334407303888 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00685.x · DOI
  30. 10.1089/bfm.2009.0047 · DOI
  31. 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303076 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.012 · DOI
  33. 10.1624/105812404X109465 · DOI
  34. 10.1542/peds.108.3.677 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00045 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026 · DOI
  38. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65 · DOI
  39. 10.1097/01.aoa.0000521239.71749.7c · DOI
  40. 10.1002/nur.4770100503 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.11.006 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.100 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s10995-008-0356-y · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00213.x · DOI
  46. 10.1111/mcn.13080 · DOI
  47. 10.1177/089033449401000217 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/089033449401000416 · DOI
  49. 10.6027/f82d3c4a-en · DOI
  50. 10.1007/springerreference_184469 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.009 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1111/birt.12268 · DOI
  54. 10.1186/s41687-020-00251-4 · DOI
  55. 10.1201/b10297-7 · DOI
  56. 10.1001/jama.2016.12195 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1002/hec.944 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.3310/hta20650 · DOI
  59. 10.1186/1745-6215-15-139 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1999.00115.x · DOI
  62. 10.1186/s12884-018-1832-z · DOI
  63. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31373-9 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Tortal, D., Shabanova, V., Taylor, S., Xu, X., McAdow, M., Stetson, B., McCollum, S., Sanchez, E., Adjakple, A., Leventhal, J., & Son, M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Son, Moeun
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2024-06-20
Volume
13
Pages
e63463-e63463
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400561266
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD111633)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
labor induction, electric breast pump, endogenous oxytocin, synthetic oxytocin, nulliparous women, normal delivery, breastfeeding success, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Feeding, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Humans, Labor, Induced, Mothers, Nipples, Oxytocin, Pregnancy, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review