Cited by 24Data-Driven Disease SurveillanceSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFood Safety and Hygiene

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Platform for Crowdsourced Foodborne Illness Surveillance: Description of Users and Reports

Open access
Quade, Patrick, Nsoesie, Elaine Okanyene·2017·JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Underreporting of foodborne illness makes foodborne disease burden estimation, timely outbreak detection, and evaluation of policies toward improving food safety challenging. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to present and evaluate Iwaspoisoned.com, an openly accessible Internet-based crowdsourcing platform that was launched in 2009 for the surveillance of foodborne illness. The goal of this system is to collect data that can be used to augment traditional approaches to foodborne disease surveillance. METHODS: Individuals affected by a foodborne illness can use this system to report their symptoms and the suspected location (eg, restaurant, hotel, hospital) of infection. We present descriptive statistics of users and businesses and highlight three instances where reports of foodborne illness were submitted before the outbreaks were officially confirmed by the local departments of health. RESULTS: More than 49,000 reports of suspected foodborne illness have been submitted on Iwaspoisoned.com since its inception by individuals from 89 countries and every state in the United States. Approximately 95.51% (42,139/44,119) of complaints implicated restaurants as the source of illness. Furthermore, an estimated 67.55% (3118/4616) of users who responded to a demographic survey were between the ages of 18 and 34, and 60.14% (2776/4616) of the respondents were female. The platform is also currently used by health departments in 90% (45/50) of states in the US to supplement existing programs on foodborne illness reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Crowdsourced disease surveillance through systems such as Iwaspoisoned.com uses the influence and familiarity of social media to create an infrastructure for easy reporting and surveillance of suspected foodborne illness events. If combined with traditional surveillance approaches, these systems have the potential to lessen the problem of foodborne illness underreporting and aid in early detection and monitoring of foodborne disease outbreaks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/publichealth.7076

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of basic facilities and infrastructure, insufficient hygiene awareness, lack of access to clean water, improper storage arrangements, unsuitable surroundings for food operations, and inadequate waste disposal facilities compromise food safety.

    “Lack of basic facilities and infrastructure, insufficient hygiene awareness, lack of access to clean water, improper storage arrangements, unsuitable surroundings for food operations (such as proximity to sewers and waste dumps), and inadequate waste disposal facilities are all considered to compromise food safety20–22.”

    From Food handling practices and sanitary conditions of charitable food assistance programs in eThekwini District, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction discusses food contamination and using illness reports to identify safety issues, but it does not address the listed facility, hygiene, water, storage, surroundings, or waste-disposal conditions. Searches for those conditions and related sanitation terms found no passage in our copy that assesses their effect on food safety; the paper focuses on crowdsourced illness surveillance. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 2015, WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: Foodborne diseases burden epidemiology reference group 2007-2015
  2. Arendt, S, 2013, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 10, 3684, 10.3390/ijerph10083684 · DOI
  3. Harris, JK, 2014, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 63, 681
  4. Harrison, C, 2014, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 63, 441
  5. 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000516 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.003 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s11908-013-0341-5 · DOI
  8. 10.1186/1742-7622-11-7 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.02.004 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/1469-0691.12477 · DOI
  11. 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302696 · DOI
  12. 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.0371243baa7f3810ba1279e30b96d3b6 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.epidem.2015.05.001 · DOI
  14. 2013, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 62, 283
  15. Patterson-Lomba, O, 2014, Am J Epidemiol, 179, 1394, 10.1093/aje/kwu061 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/srep09540 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0114925 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.cc09a42586e16dc7dd62813b7ee5d6b6 · DOI
  19. 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.cc09a42586e16dc7dd62813b7ee5d6b6 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-984 · DOI
  21. 10.2196/jmir.3863 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/srep40841 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Quade, P., & Nsoesie, E. O.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Quade, Patrick
Venue
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Published
2017-07-05
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
e42
ISSN
2369-2960 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2730840272
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (K01ES025438)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM011965)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
Keywords
food poisoning, underreporting, outbreak detection, restaurant food safety, social media, online reporting, food safety policy, health departments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review