A virtual world versus face-to-face intervention format to promote diabetes self-management among african american women: a pilot randomized clinical trial
Open accessAbstract
Background: Virtual world environments have the potential to increase access to diabetes self-management interventions and may lower cost. Objective: We tested the feasibility and comparative effectiveness of a virtual world versus a face-to-face diabetes self-management group intervention. Methods: We recruited African American women with type 2 diabetes to participate in an 8-week diabetes self-management program adapted from Power to Prevent, a behavior-change in-person group program for African Americans with diabetes or pre-diabetes. The program is social cognitive theory–guided, evidence-based, and culturally tailored. Participants were randomized to participate in the program via virtual world (Second Life) or face-to-face, both delivered by a single intervention team. Blinded assessors conducted in-person clinical (HbA1c), behavioral, and psychosocial measurements at baseline and 4-month follow-up. Pre-post differences within and between intervention groups were assessed using t tests and chi-square tests (two-sided and intention-to-treat analyses for all comparisons). Results: Participants (N=89) were an average of 52 years old (SD 10), 60% had ≤high school, 82% had household incomes P=.90). Compared to face-to-face, virtual world was slightly superior for total activity, light activity, and inactivity (P=.05, P=.07, and P=.025, respectively). HbA1c reduction was significant within face-to-face (−0.46, P=02) but not within virtual world (−0.31, P=.19), although there were no significant between group differences in HbA1c (P=.52). In both groups, 14% fewer patients had post-intervention HbA1c ≥9% (virtual world P=.014; face-to-face P=.002), with no significant between group difference (P=.493). Compared to virtual world, face-to-face was marginally superior for reducing depression symptoms (P=.051). The virtual world intervention costs were US $1117 versus US $931 for face-to-face. Conclusions: It is feasible to deliver diabetes self-management interventions to inner city African American women via virtual worlds, and outcomes may be comparable to those of face-to-face interventions. Further effectiveness research is warranted. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01340079; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01340079 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6T2aSvmka).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Little is known about the practicality of using a technology-based intervention to deliver a multi-behavioral change intervention in racially diverse women.
“Little is known about the practicality of using a technology-based intervention to deliver a multi-behavioral change intervention in racially diverse women [10, 11].”
From Engaging women with an embodied conversational agent to deliver mindfulness and lifestyle recommendations: A feasibility randomized control trial (2017) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [38]Felnhofer A Kothgassner OD Beutl L Hlavacs H Kryspin-Exner I Is virtual reality made for men only? Exploring gender differences in the sense of presence 2012 14th Annual Conference of the International Society on Presence Research Oct 25-26, 2012 Philadelphia, PA
- [39]Hunt E Allahyar M Gender differences in computer-simulated virtual environments 2001 13th Annual American Psychological Society Conference June 14-17, 2001 Toronto, Canada
- Authors
- Rosal, M. C., Heyden, R., Mejilla, R., Capelson, R., Chalmers, K. A., Rizzo DePaoli, M., Veerappa, C., & Wiecha, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rosal, Milagros C
- ORCID
- Rosal, Milagros C
- Venue
- JMIR Research Protocols
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2014-10-24
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e54
- ISSN
- 1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4259910
- OpenAlex
- W2090804290
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U48DP001933)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (RC1LM010412)
- National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U48 DP001933)
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60MD006912)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- virtual worlds, Second Life, diabetes self-management, type 2 diabetes, African American women, face-to-face intervention, HbA1c, physical activity, depression, social cognitive theory, culturally tailored interventions, intervention costs, feasibility, telemedicine, inner-city neighborhoods, online health interventions, group intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review