Cited by 56Diabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

A virtual world versus face-to-face intervention format to promote diabetes self-management among african american women: a pilot randomized clinical trial

Open access
Rosal, Milagros C, Heyden, Robin, Mejilla, Roanne, Capelson, Roberta, Chalmers, Karen A, Rizzo DePaoli, Maria, Veerappa, Chetty, Wiecha, John M·2014·JMIR Research Protocols

Abstract

Background: Virtual world environments have the potential to increase access to diabetes self-management interventions and may lower cost. Objective: We tested the feasibility and comparative effectiveness of a virtual world versus a face-to-face diabetes self-management group intervention. Methods: We recruited African American women with type 2 diabetes to participate in an 8-week diabetes self-management program adapted from Power to Prevent, a behavior-change in-person group program for African Americans with diabetes or pre-diabetes. The program is social cognitive theory–guided, evidence-based, and culturally tailored. Participants were randomized to participate in the program via virtual world (Second Life) or face-to-face, both delivered by a single intervention team. Blinded assessors conducted in-person clinical (HbA1c), behavioral, and psychosocial measurements at baseline and 4-month follow-up. Pre-post differences within and between intervention groups were assessed using t tests and chi-square tests (two-sided and intention-to-treat analyses for all comparisons). Results: Participants (N=89) were an average of 52 years old (SD 10), 60% had ≤high school, 82% had household incomes P=.90). Compared to face-to-face, virtual world was slightly superior for total activity, light activity, and inactivity (P=.05, P=.07, and P=.025, respectively). HbA1c reduction was significant within face-to-face (−0.46, P=02) but not within virtual world (−0.31, P=.19), although there were no significant between group differences in HbA1c (P=.52). In both groups, 14% fewer patients had post-intervention HbA1c ≥9% (virtual world P=.014; face-to-face P=.002), with no significant between group difference (P=.493). Compared to virtual world, face-to-face was marginally superior for reducing depression symptoms (P=.051). The virtual world intervention costs were US $1117 versus US $931 for face-to-face. Conclusions: It is feasible to deliver diabetes self-management interventions to inner city African American women via virtual worlds, and outcomes may be comparable to those of face-to-face interventions. Further effectiveness research is warranted. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01340079; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01340079 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6T2aSvmka).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/resprot.3412

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 56

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [38]Felnhofer A Kothgassner OD Beutl L Hlavacs H Kryspin-Exner I Is virtual reality made for men only? Exploring gender differences in the sense of presence 2012 14th Annual Conference of the International Society on Presence Research Oct 25-26, 2012 Philadelphia, PA
  2. [39]Hunt E Allahyar M Gender differences in computer-simulated virtual environments 2001 13th Annual American Psychological Society Conference June 14-17, 2001 Toronto, Canada

Authors
Rosal, M. C., Heyden, R., Mejilla, R., Capelson, R., Chalmers, K. A., Rizzo DePaoli, M., Veerappa, C., & Wiecha, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Rosal, Milagros C
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2014-10-24
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
e54
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090804290
Cited by
56
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U48DP001933)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (RC1LM010412)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U48 DP001933)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60MD006912)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
virtual worlds, Second Life, diabetes self-management, type 2 diabetes, African American women, face-to-face intervention, HbA1c, physical activity, depression, social cognitive theory, culturally tailored interventions, intervention costs, feasibility, telemedicine, inner-city neighborhoods, online health interventions, group intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review