Business Modeling to Implement an eHealth Portal for Infection Control: A Reflection on Co-Creation With Stakeholders
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It is acknowledged that the success and uptake of eHealth improve with the involvement of users and stakeholders to make technology reflect their needs. Involving stakeholders in implementation research is thus a crucial element in developing eHealth technology. Business modeling is an approach to guide implementation research for eHealth. Stakeholders are involved in business modeling by identifying relevant stakeholders, conducting value co-creation dialogs, and co-creating a business model. Because implementation activities are often underestimated as a crucial step while developing eHealth, comprehensive and applicable approaches geared toward business modeling in eHealth are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This paper demonstrates the potential of several stakeholder-oriented analysis methods and their practical application was demonstrated using Infectionmanager as an example case. In this paper, we aim to demonstrate how business modeling, with the focus on stakeholder involvement, is used to co-create an eHealth implementation. METHODS: We divided business modeling in 4 main research steps. As part of stakeholder identification, we performed literature scans, expert recommendations, and snowball sampling (Step 1). For stakeholder analyzes, we performed "basic stakeholder analysis," stakeholder salience, and ranking/analytic hierarchy process (Step 2). For value co-creation dialogs, we performed a process analysis and stakeholder interviews based on the business model canvas (Step 3). Finally, for business model generation, we combined all findings into the business model canvas (Step 4). RESULTS: Based on the applied methods, we synthesized a step-by-step guide for business modeling with stakeholder-oriented analysis methods that we consider suitable for implementing eHealth. CONCLUSIONS: The step-by-step guide for business modeling with stakeholder involvement enables eHealth researchers to apply a systematic and multidisciplinary, co-creative approach for implementing eHealth. Business modeling becomes an active part in the entire development process of eHealth and starts an early focus on implementation, in which stakeholders help to co-create the basis necessary for a satisfying success and uptake of the eHealth technology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the included papers it was shown that stakeholder maps are not created from scratch but are based on data.
“First, in the included papers it was shown that stakeholder maps are not created from scratch but are based on data.”
From Methods for Human-Centered eHealth Development: Narrative Scoping Review (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Experience has shown that creating a business model is very time consuming, partly because there are no business models specifically for eHealth yet.
“Second, experience has shown that creating a business model is very time consuming, partly because there are no business models specifically for eHealth yet”
From Methods for Human-Centered eHealth Development: Narrative Scoping Review (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
A business model often does not have a fixed end and needs to be adapted continuously throughout the implementation and evaluation phases of an eHealth technology.
“Third, a business model often does not have a fixed end and needs to be adapted continuously throughout the implementation and evaluation phases of an eHealth technology”
From Methods for Human-Centered eHealth Development: Narrative Scoping Review (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 59
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- [16]van Gemert-Pijnen L Persuasive technology to implement ASP in practice 2014 Antibiotic Stewardship Symposium “Optimal Use of Antimicrobial Therapy” Nov 10-11, 2014 Groningen, The Netherlands
- [28]Ewering S Integrating Stakeholders in the Development of an Antibiotic Stewardship Program [master’s thesis] 2011 2015-08-08 Enschede, The Netherlands University of Twente http://essay.utwente.nl/61340/1/Ewering%2C_S._-_s0195561_%28verslag%29.pdf
- [31]O’Haire C McPheeters M Nakamoto E LaBrant L Most C Lee K Graham E Cottrell E Guise J-M Methods Future Research Needs Reports, Number 4 (11-EHC044-EF) 2011 6 2015-08-08 Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) Engaging stakeholders to identify and prioritize future research needs http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK62565/ 21977526
- [32]Veldhuis F Possible Critical Factors for the Implementation of the Infection Manager in Healthcare [master's thesis] 2012 2015-08-11 Enschede, The Netherlands University of Twente http://essay.utwente.nl/62538/1/Master_Thesis_F.E._Veldhuis.pdf 6agwx9Mrk
- [42]Nijland N Grounding eHealth: Towards a Holistic Framework for Sustainable eHealth Technologies [dissertation] 2011 2015-08-10 Enschede, The Netherlands University of Twente http://doc.utwente.nl/75576/1/thesis_N_Nijland.pdf 6agJGzuwF
- [48]Nijhof N EHealth for People With Dementia in Home-Based and Residential Care [dissertation] 2013 2015-08-10 Enschede, The Netherlands University of Twente http://www.utwente.nl/bms/pgt/bestanden/nijhofproefschrift.pdf 6agJz89RE
- [49]Roskam R Evaluation of Online Public Sexual Health Care in the Netherlands: A Scenario-Based User Evaluation [master's thesis] 2014 2015-08-10 Enschede, The Netherlands University of Twente http://essay.utwente.nl/65152/1/RoskamRV_MSc_MB.pdf 6agK7CKwv
- [50]Steunebrink LMM Participatory Development of an Application for Preventing a Diabetic Foot to Optimize the Service Quality [master's thesis] 2011 6 22 Enschede, The Netherlands University of Twente
- Authors
- van Limburg, M., Wentzel, J., Sanderman, R., & van Gemert-Pijnen, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Twente (NL)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Venue
- JMIR Research Protocols
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2015-08-13
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e104
- ISSN
- 1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4736288
- OpenAlex
- W1171422235
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Keywords
- business modeling, eHealth implementation, stakeholder co-creation, infection control, business model canvas, stakeholder analysis, analytic hierarchy process, stakeholder salience, implementation research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review