Cited by 5Indigenous Peoples' Rights and LawIndigenous Cultures and HistoryEnvironmental law and policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Wahkohtowin in Action

Open access
Wildcat, Matthew·2018·Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel

Abstract

From a Canadian legal standpoint, a common concern expressed about Indigenous law is that it is difficult to track down. As Hadley Friedland summarizes, “even people who want to engage more deeply with Indigenous legal traditions struggle to understand how to do so.” In response, Friedland has proposed a case law method that allows Indigenous communities and legal practitioners to access Indigenous law. I believe the case law method can be valuable, but I hope to provide an illustration of the operation of Indigenous law by looking at how the Cree/Metis principle of wahkohtowin was infused through the work of the Maskwacîs Education Schools Commission (MESC). My work here does not attempt to describe in full how wahkohtowin operates as a legal principle within Maskwacîs. Rather, I focus on the central role wahkohtowin played in the largest institutional transformation the community has ever undertaken.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21991/cf29362

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Wildcat, M.
Corresponding author
Wildcat, Matthew
Venue
Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel
Published
2018-06-27
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
13
ISSN
  • 0847-3889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1927-4165
OpenAlex
W2811405627
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
Keywords
indigenous law, Cree, Métis, Indigenous legal traditions, indigenous education, institutional change, legal pluralism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wahkohtowin in Action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21991/cf29362
The paper
Wildcat, M. (2018). Wahkohtowin in Action. Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel. https://doi.org/10.21991/cf29362