The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice
Abstract
Model based software development differs from the conventional software development process and used in conjunction with a range of agile techniques. Despite improvements in third generation programming languages and runtime platforms, the levels of abstraction at which PLAs are developed today remains low-level relative to the concepts and concerns within the application domains themselves, such as manually tracking the library dependency or ensuring component composition syntactical and semantic correctness. [1] A promising means to address this problem involves developing PLAs using model-driven engineering (MDE) [2] which involves systematic use of models as key design and implementation artifacts throughout the software lifecycle. Thus to induce the works on architectures and models, researchers have been working to create structured models. The literature in this area hence proliferates; where the current edition [3] tries to address some of the significant aspects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 38,662
(1994) · Cited by 21,711
Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools
Aho, A. V., Sethi, R., & Ullman, J. D. (1986) · Cited by 8,082
The Unified Software Development Process
Jacobson, I., Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, J. E. (1999) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 3,389
Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction
(1993) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07627-x · Cited by 1,603
EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework 2.0
Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., & Merks, E. (2009) · Cited by 1,464
THE INSTITUTEOF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS,INC.
Blackmon, H., Harder, E. L., Saito, S., Sinclair, G. W., Siusskind, C., Pratt, H., Tucker, E., Consultant, S., & Taylor, H. (1966) · Cited by 1,344
Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers
Grudin, J. (1994) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/175222.175230 · Cited by 1,228
Moody, D. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2009.67 · Cited by 1,204
Mellor, S. J., Scott, K., Uhl, A., & Weise, D. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46105-1_33 · Cited by 1,111
Cited by
Xatkit: A Multimodal Low-Code Chatbot Development Framework
Daniel, G., Cabot, J., Deruelle, L., & Derras, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2966919 · Cited by 173
Self-citationModel-based security engineering for cyber-physical systems: A systematic mapping study
Nguyen, P. H., Ali, S., & Yue, T. (2017) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2016.11.004 · Cited by 107
Descriptive theory of awareness for groupware development
Collazos, C. A., Gutiérrez, F. L., Gallardo, J., Ortega, M., Fardoun, H. M., & Molina, A. I. (2019) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-018-1165-9 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., & Wimmer, M.
- Venue
- Synthesis lectures on software engineering
- Publisher
- Morgan & Claypool Publishers
- Published
- 2012-09-21
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-182
- ISSN
- 2328-3319 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107465592
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 126.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2200/s00441ed1v01y201208swe001
- The paper
- Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., & Wimmer, M. (2012). Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice. Synthesis lectures on software engineering. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00441ed1v01y201208swe001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
