Cited by 1Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesEvaluation and Performance AssessmentStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Fuzzy Differences-in-Differences

Open access
De Chaisemartin, Clement, D'Haultfoeuille, Xavier, De Chaisemartin, Clement, D'Haultfoeuille, Xavier·2015·Unknown

Abstract

In many applications of the dierences-in-dierences (DID) method, the treatment increases more in the treatment group, but some units are also treated in the control group. In such fuzzy designs, a popular estimator of treatment eects is the DID of the outcome divided by the DID of the treatment, or OLS and 2SLS regressions with time and group xed eects estimating weighted averages of this ratio across groups. We start by showing that when the treatment also increases in the control group, this ratio estimates a causal eect only if treatment eects are homogenous in the two groups. Even when the distribution of treatment is stable, it requires that the eect of time be the same on all counterfactual outcomes. As this assumption is not always applicable, we propose two alternative estimators. The rst estimator relies on a generalization of common trends assumptions to fuzzy designs, while the second extends the changes-in-changes estimator of Athey & Imbens (2006). When the distribution of treatment changes in the control group, treatment eects are partially identied. Finally, we prove that our estimators are asymptotically normal and use them to revisit applied papers using fuzzy designs.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.22004/ag.econ.270218

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Chaisemartin, C., D'Haultfoeuille, X., De Chaisemartin, C., & D'Haultfoeuille, X.
Venue
Unknown
Publisher
Unknown
Published
2015
OpenAlex
W3123021196
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
local average treatment effect, treatment effect estimation, treatment effect heterogeneity, asymptotic normality, estimands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review