The Inverted “U-Shaped” Dose-Effect Relationships in Learning and Memory: Modulation of Arousal and Consolidation
Open accessAbstract
In the ample field of biological non-linear relationships there is also the inverted U-shaped dose-effect. In relation to cognitive functions, this phenomenon has been widely reported for many active compounds, in several learning paradigms, in several animal species and does not depend on either administration route (systemic or endocerebral) or administration time (before or after training). This review summarizes its most interesting aspects. The hypothesized mechanisms supporting it are reported and discussed, with particular emphasis on the participation of emotional arousal levels in the modulation of memory processes. Findings on the well documented relationship between stress, emotional arousal, peripheral epinephrine levels, cerebral norepinephrine levels and memory consolidation are reported. These are discussed and the need for further research is underlined.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dopamine in the prefrontal cortex has an inverse-U-shaped association with working memory performance.
“have demonstrated that dopamine in the PFC possesses an inverse‐U‐shaped association with WM performance (Baldi & Bucherelli, 2005; Cools & D'Esposito, 2011).”
From Systematic reviews of the acute effects of amphetamine on working memory and other cognitive performances in healthy individuals, with a focus on the potential influence of personality traits (2023) · cites this paper as Baldi & Bucherelli, 2005
The unique basal level of dopamine in every individual that causes differences in personality trait scores might cause WM performance variation between persons.
“The unique basal level of dopamine in every individual that causes differences in personality trait scores, in turn by transitivity, might cause WM performance variation between persons”
From Systematic reviews of the acute effects of amphetamine on working memory and other cognitive performances in healthy individuals, with a focus on the potential influence of personality traits (2023) · cites this paper as Baldi & Bucherelli, 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 220
- Authors
- Baldi, E., & Bucherelli, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Florence (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Bucherelli, Corrado
- Venue
- Nonlinearity in Biology, Toxicology, Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-21
- ISSN
- 1540-1421 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2657842
- OpenAlex
- W2056179366
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nonlinearity in Biology Toxicology Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- learning, memory consolidation, emotional arousal, stress, epinephrine, norepinephrine, cognitive enhancement, memory modulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review