The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical Inference for Variable Importance
Abstract
Many statistical problems involve the learning of an importance/effect of a variable for predicting an outcome of interest based on observing a sample of $n$ independent and identically distributed observations on a list of input variables and an outcome. For example, though prediction/machine learning is, in principle, concerned with learning the optimal unknown mapping from input variables to an outcome from the data, the typical reported output is a list of importance measures for each input variable. The approach in prediction has been to learn the unknown optimal predictor from the data and derive, for each of the input variables, the variable importance from the obtained fit. In this article we propose a new approach which involves for each variable separately 1) defining variable importance as a real valued parameter, 2) deriving the efficient influence curve and thereby optimal estimating function for this parameter in the assumed (possibly nonparametric) model, and 3) develop a corresponding double robust locally efficient estimator of this variable importance, obtained by substituting for the nuisance parameters in the optimal estimating function data adaptive estimators. We illustrate this methodology in the context of prediction, and obtain in this manner double robust locally optimal estimators of marginal variable importance, accompanied with p-values and confidence intervals. In addition, we present a model based and machine learning approach to estimate covariate-adjusted variable importance. Finally, we generalize this methodology to variable importance parameters for time-dependent variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Cited by
Fisher, A., Rudin, C., & Dominici, F. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.01489 · Cited by 1,165
Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures
Archer, K. J., & Kimes, R. V. (2008) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2007.08.015 · Cited by 1,123
Robins, J., Sued, M., Lei-Gomez, Q., & Rotnitzky, A. (2007) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/07-sts227d · Cited by 313
Variable importance in regression models
Grömping, U. (2015) · WIREs Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.1346 · Cited by 304
Why Match? Investigating Matched Case-Control Study Designs with Causal Effect Estimation
Rose, S., & van der Laan, M. J. (2009) · The International Journal of Biostatistics · doi:10.2202/1557-4679.1127 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Laan, M. J.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Biostatistics
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2006-02-20
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1557-4679 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169986380
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Inference for Variable Importance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2202/1557-4679.1008
- The paper
- van der Laan, M. J. (2006). Statistical Inference for Variable Importance. The International Journal of Biostatistics. https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.