A Starting Point for Analyzing Basketball Statistics
Abstract
The quantitative analysis of sports is a growing branch of science and, in many ways one that has developed through non-academic and non-traditionally peer-reviewed work. The aim of this paper is to bring to a peer-reviewed journal the generally accepted basics of the analysis of basketball, thereby providing a common starting point for future research in basketball. The possession concept, in particular the concept of equal possessions for opponents in a game, is central to basketball analysis. Estimates of possessions have existed for approximately two decades, but the various formulas have sometimes created confusion. We hope that by showing how most previous formulas are special cases of our more general formulation, we shed light on the relationship between possessions and various statistics. Also, we hope that our new estimates can provide a common basis for future possession estimation. In addition to listing data sources for statistical research on basketball, we also discuss other concepts and methods, including offensive and defensive ratings, plays, per-minute statistics, pace adjustments, true shooting percentage, effective field goal percentage, rebound rates, Four Factors, plus/minus statistics, counterpart statistics, linear weights metrics, individual possession usage, individual efficiency, Pythagorean method, and Bell Curve method. This list is not an exhaustive list of methodologies used in the field, but we believe that they provide a set of tools that fit…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploiting sports-betting market using machine learning
Hubáček, O., Šourek, G., & Železný, F. (2019) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.01.001 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Predictions of european basketball match results with machine learning algorithms
Lampis, T., Ioannis, N., Vasilios, V., & Stavrianna, D. (2023) · Journal of Sports Analytics · doi:10.3233/jsa-220639 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kubatko, J., Oliver, D., Pelton, K., & Rosenbaum, D. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2007-01-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1559-0410 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058731786
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- basketball statistics, rebound rate, linear weights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review