Cited by 36Religious Freedom and DiscriminationQur’anic Interpretation StudiesLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies

Law of Apostasy and Freedom of Religion in Malaysia

Mohamed Adil, Mohamed Azam·2007·Asian Journal of Comparative Law

Abstract

The right to freedom of religion is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed in Islam. This is emphasised in verse 256 of Sura al-Baqara: "Let there be no compulsion in religion". However, the majority of classical Muslim jurists opine that the right to freedom of religion is not applicable to Muslims, that Muslims who intend to leave the Islamic faith or who have apostatised should be condemned to the death penalty. In reality, punishment for apostasy is not prescribed in the Qur'an and had not been practised by the Prophet (S.A.W.). Instead, the Prophet (S.A.W.) had imposed the death penalty upon apostates because their acts were contemptuous of, and hostile towards, Islam. Muslims who merely renounced the Islamic religion were only required to undergo a process of repentance (tawba). The right to freedom of religion is guaranteed in Article 11(1) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. However, as Islamic matters belong to the state jurisdictions, most provisions in relation to apostasy are under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Shari'a Courts. Apostates are subject to punishments such as fine, imprisonment and whipping. This article makes an in-depth study of the right to freedom of religion and the issue of apostasy from the Islamic law perspective, and argues that Muslims who intend to leave the Islamic faith are only required to undergo a process of repentance (tawba), and any punishment prescribed for apostasy is contrary to the right to freedom of religion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2202/1932-0205.1060

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The application of severe penalties for apostasy was historically contingent upon sedition or hostility against the nascent Islamic polity, rather than merely a private conversion to a different faith.

    “This reevaluation suggests that the application of severe penalties was historically contingent upon sedition or hostility against the nascent Islamic polity, rather than merely a private conversion to a different faith (Mohamed Adil, 2007).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohamed Adil, M. A.
Venue
Asian Journal of Comparative Law
Published
2007-01-19
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
1-36
ISSN
1932-0205 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995831271
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asian Journal of Comparative Law (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Keywords
apostasy, religious freedom, Islamic law, repentance, death penalty, Islamic courts, Federal Constitution of Malaysia, Article 11

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review