Cited by 99Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Environmental distribution of personal care products and their effects on human health

Open access
Khalid·2021·PubMed

Abstract

, thus exposing humans easily. Personal preferences related to PCPs usage frequency are highly variable and depend on socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors. The increasing availability and diversity of PCPs from the retailer outlets consequently result in higher loading of PCPs into wastewater systems and, therefore, the environment. These compounds persistently and continuously release biologically active and inactive ingredients in the atmosphere, biosphere, geosphere, and demonstrating adverse effects on human, wild, and marine life. Advanced techniques such as granular activated carbon filtration and algae-based system may help biotransformation and remove PCP contaminants from water with improved efficiency. Additionally, harmony among PCPs related regulations of different countries may encourage standard checks to control their manufacturing, sale, and distribution across the borders to ensure consumers' safety. Furthermore, all intended ingredients, their concentrations, and instructions for frequency of use as per age groups may be clearly labeled on packages of PCPs. In conclusion, the emerging environmental contaminants of PCPs and their association with the growing risks of negative effects on human health and globally on the environment emphasize the chemical-free simple lifestyle.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.22037/ijpr.2021.114891.15088

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In silico computational methods have provided valuable tools for evaluating the effects of cosmetics on consumer well-being.

    “In addition to the traditional safety evaluation methods mentioned earlier, the field of cosmetic safety assessment has seen advancements in recent years, particularly in the use of in silico approaches (106, 124). These computational methods have provided valuable tools for evaluating the effects of cosmetics on consumer well-being.”

    From The dark side of beauty: an in-depth analysis of the health hazards and toxicological impact of synthetic cosmetics and personal care products (2024) · cites this paper as [124]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses how personal-care-product ingredients can bind to sex hormone-binding globulin and cites a computational study listed in the References. This supports an example of computational analysis relevant to health effects, but the paper does not characterize in silico methods broadly as valuable tools for evaluating cosmetics’ effects on consumer well-being. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 270 · Cited by 99

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Pandey A Jatana GK Sonthalia S Cosmeceuticals 2000 Treasure Island (FL) StatPearls Publishing 31334943
  2. [225]Geer LA Pycke BFG Waxenbaum J Sherer DM Abulafia O Halden RU Association of birth outcomes with fetal exposure to parabens, triclosan and triclocarban in an immigrant population in Brooklyn, New York J. Hazard. Mater. 2017 323 177 83 27156397 PMC5018415

Authors
Khalid
Venue
PubMed
Publisher
National Institutes of Health
Published
2021-01-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
216-253
OpenAlex
W3171405807
Cited by
99
References
270
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
personal care products, environmental distribution, human health effects, wastewater pollution, environmental pollutants, granular activated carbon filtration, chemical regulation, product labeling, consumer safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review