Cited by 40Environmental Chemistry and AnalysisWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CHARACTERIZATION OF FECES FOR DESCRIBING THE AEROBIC BIODEGRADATION OF FECES

Open access
LOPEZ ZAVALA, Miguel Angel, FUNAMIZU, Naoyuki, TAKAKUWA, Tetsuo·2002·Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu

Abstract

Characterization of organic matter attending biodegradability is a common practice when a bio-kinetic model is used to describe the reaction rates at which organic matter of wastewater is biodegraded. However, procedures for characterizing organic matter contained in feces have not been reported yet. This paper deals with the characterization of feces; two approaches for characterizing organic matter of feces are discussed based on physicochemical determinations and biological response during aerobic degradation. Application of those procedures leaded to characterization of feces in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and mass units.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2208/jscej.2002.720_99

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 9) Grady, C. P. L., Daigger, G. T. and Lim, H. C.: Biological wastewater treatment. 2nd Edition, Marcel Dekker, Inc. USA, 1999.
  2. 13) Lopez Zavala, M. A., Funamizu, N. and Takakuwa, T.: Organic load influence on aerobic biodegradation of feces by using sawdust as a matrix. Proceedings Asian Waterqual 2001, Fukuoka, Japan, 2001.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
LOPEZ ZAVALA, M. A., FUNAMIZU, N., & TAKAKUWA, T.
Affiliations
  • Dept. of Environmental Eng. Hokkaido University
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
Venue
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu
Published
2002-11-22
Volume
2002
Issue
720
Pages
99-105
ISSN
  • 0289-7806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1882-7187
OpenAlex
W2007780508
Cited by
40
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Keywords
feces, organic matter characterization, aerobic biodegradation, biodegradability, chemical oxygen demand, wastewater treatment, reaction rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review