Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 878

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of Unsuspected Pancreatic Cysts on MDCT

Open access
Laffan, Thomas A., Horton, Karen M., Klein, Alison P., Berlanstein, Bruce, Siegelman, Stanley S., Kawamoto, Satomi, Johnson, Pamela T., Fishman, Elliot K., Hruban, Ralph H.·2008·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current generation MDCT technology facilitates identification of small, nonenhancing lesions in the pancreas. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of findings of unsuspected pancreatic cysts on 16-MDCT in a population of adult outpatients imaged for disease unrelated to the pancreas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast-enhanced MDCT scans of the abdomen were reviewed from 2,832 consecutive examinations to identify pancreatic cysts. Patients with a history of pancreatic lesions or predisposing factors for pancreatic disease or who were referred for pancreatic CT were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients had pancreatic cysts, representing a prevalence of 2.6 per 100 patients (95% CI, 2.0-3.2). Cysts ranged in size from 2 to 38 mm (mean, 8.9 mm) and were solitary in 85% of cases. Analysis of demographic information showed a strong correlation between pancreatic cysts and age, with no cysts identified among patients under 40 years and a prevalence of 8.7 per 100 (95% CI, 4.6-12.9) in individuals from 80 to 89 years. After controlling for age, cysts were more common in individuals of the Asian race than all other race categories, with an odds ratio of 3.57 (95% CI, 1.05-12.13). There was no difference by sex in the prevalence of cysts (p = 0.527); however, cysts were on average 3.6 mm larger (p = 0.014) in men than women. CONCLUSION: In this outpatient population, the prevalence of unsuspected pancreatic cysts identified on 16-MDCT was 2.6%. Cyst presence strongly correlated with increasing age and the Asian race.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.07.3340

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 878

Metadata

Authors
Laffan, T. A., Horton, K. M., Klein, A. P., Berlanstein, B., Siegelman, S. S., Kawamoto, S., Johnson, P. T., Fishman, E. K., & Hruban, R. H.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
2008-09
Volume
191
Issue
3
Pages
802-807
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2083670334
Cited by
878
References
1
FWCI
20.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Unsuspected Pancreatic Cysts on MDCT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.07.3340
The paper
Laffan, T. A., Horton, K. M., Klein, A. P., Berlanstein, B., Siegelman, S. S., Kawamoto, S., Johnson, P. T., Fishman, E. K., & Hruban, R. H. (2008). Prevalence of Unsuspected Pancreatic Cysts on MDCT. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.3340

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.