Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE TREATMENT AND PROGNOSIS OF MEDULLOBLASTOMA IN CHILDREN: A STUDY OF 82 VERIFIED CASES

BLOOM, H. J. G., WALLACE, E. N. K., HENK, J. M.·1969·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

A study has been made of 82 histologically verified cases of medulloblastoma under 15 years of age referred for irradiation to the Royal Marsden Hospital between 1950 and 1964. The age range was 11 months to 14 years. The ratio of boys to girls was 2.2:1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.105.1.43

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
BLOOM, H. J. G., WALLACE, E. N. K., & HENK, J. M.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
1969-01
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
43-62
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2016899610
Cited by
380
References
0
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE TREATMENT AND PROGNOSIS OF MEDULLOBLASTOMA IN CHILDREN: A STUDY OF 82 VERIFIED CASES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.105.1.43
The paper
BLOOM, H. J. G., WALLACE, E. N. K., & HENK, J. M. (1969). THE TREATMENT AND PROGNOSIS OF MEDULLOBLASTOMA IN CHILDREN: A STUDY OF 82 VERIFIED CASES. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.105.1.43

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.