Cited by 189Characterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes

Iron-based superparamagnetic nanoparticle contrast agents for MRI of infection and inflammation

Open access
Neuwelt, Alexander, Sidhu, Navneet, Hu, Chien-An A., Mlady, Gary, Eberhardt, Steven C., Sillerud, Laurel O.·2015·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. In this article, we summarize the progress to date on the use of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) as contrast agents for MRI of inflammatory processes. CONCLUSION. Phagocytosis by macrophages of injected SPIONs results in a prolonged shortening of both T2 and T2* leading to hypointensity of macrophage-infiltrated tissues in contrast-enhanced MR images. SPIONs as contrast agents are therefore useful for the in vivo MRI detection of macrophage infiltration, and there is substantial research and clinical interest in the use of SPION-based contrast agents for MRI of infection and inflammation. This technique has been used to identify active infection in patients with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis; importantly, the MRI signal intensity of the tissue has been found to return to its unenhanced value on successful treatment of the infection. In SPION contrast-enhanced MRI of vascular inflammation, animal studies have shown decreased macrophage uptake in atherosclerotic plaques after treatment with statin drugs. Human studies have shown that both coronary and carotid plaques that take up SPIONs are more prone to rupture and that abdominal aneurysms with increased SPION uptake are more likely to grow. Studies of patients with multiple sclerosis suggest that MRI using SPIONs may have increased sensitivity over gadolinium for plaque detection. Finally, SPIONs have enabled the tracking and imaging of transplanted stem cells in a recipient host.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.14.12733

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SPION have been extensively used for diagnostic purposes, for visualizing tumors and metastases in liver, spleen and lymph nodes, for angiography as a blood pool agent, and for visualizing inflammatory lesions like atherosclerotic plaques.

    “SPION have been extensively used for diagnostic purposes, for visualizing tumors and metastases in liver, spleen and lymph nodes [137, 138], for angiography as a blood pool agent [139] and for visualizing inflammatory lesions like atherosclerotic plaques [140].”
  • SPION with a hydrodynamic diameter of 20-30 nm, referred to as ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO), show a prolonged circulation time and are favorable for lymphography, imaging inflammation and blood pool imaging.

    “SPION with a hydrodynamic diameter of 20-30 nm, which are referred to as ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) [154], show a prolonged circulation time and therefore are favorable for lymphography [155], for imaging inflammation [140] and for blood pool imaging [156].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 189

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Sephel GC Woodward SC Rubin DS Strayer DS Repair, regeneration, and fibrosis Rubin’s pathology 5 Philadelphia, PA Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2007 71 98

Authors
Neuwelt, A., Sidhu, N., Hu, C.-A. A., Mlady, G., Eberhardt, S. C., & Sillerud, L. O.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
2015-03
Volume
204
Issue
3
Pages
W302-W313
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2098568687
Cited by
189
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Roentgenology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA123194)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Keywords
superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, MRI contrast agents, infection imaging, inflammation imaging, macrophage infiltration, T2 relaxation, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, vascular inflammation, atherosclerotic plaque, plaque rupture, abdominal aortic aneurysm, multiple sclerosis, stem cell tracking
MeSH terms
Animals, Contrast Media, Dextrans, Humans, Infections, Inflammation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nanoparticles, Magnetite Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review