The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radiation effects on cerebral white matter: MR evaluation
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the white-matter changes associated with cranial radiation by MR imaging. The MR scans of 95 patients receiving conventional external beam radiation for a wide variety of central nervous system tumors were reviewed. Moderately T2-weighted spin-echo images with a 2000-msec repetition time and 56-msec-echo time were analyzed for white-matter abnormalities without knowledge of the patient's history. These were correlated with radiation dose, port, and time interval since completion of therapy, and then compared with an age-matched control group of 180 patients with nonirradiated, space-occupying, intracranial lesions. Radiation-related lesions were characterized as symmetric, high-signal foci in the periventricular white matter. Relative sparing of the posterior fossa, basal ganglia, and internal capsules was noted. In patients older than 20 years, these changes paralleled those seen in ischemia but were more prevalent (p less than .005). In 25 patients with sequential MR scans, these findings remained stable. In those patients with limited treatment fields, for example, pituitary adenomas, no statistical differences were seen between radiation-treated and nontreated groups. Cerebral white-matter changes that mimic deep white-matter infarction are frequently seen in response to therapeutic radiation. There is a variable incidence of radiation effects, becoming more marked in older patients. MR interpretation must consider the neuropathologic consequences of therapeutic radiation, which include demyelination, microvascular occlusion, and blood-brain barrier breakdown.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Radiation response of the central nervous system
Schultheiss, T. E., Kun, L. E., Ang, K. K., & Stephens, L. C. (1995) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(94)00655-5 · Cited by 653
Mechanisms of radiotherapy-associated cognitive disability in patients with brain tumours
Makale, M. T., McDonald, C. R., Hattangadi-Gluth, J. A., & Kesari, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.185 · Cited by 527
Gholamin, S., Mitra, S. S., Feroze, A. H., Liu, J., Kahn, S. A., Zhang, M., Esparza, R., Richard, C., Ramaswamy, V., Remke, M., et al. (2017) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2968 · Cited by 426
Adverse long-term effects of brain radiotherapy in adult low-grade glioma patients
Surma-aho, O., Niemelä, M., Vilkki, J., Kouri, M., Brander, A., Salonen, O., Paetau, A., Kallio, M., Pyykkönen, L., & Jääskeläinen, J. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.10.1285 · Cited by 319
Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in optic neuropathies
Guy, J., Mancuso, A., Quisling, R. G., Beck, R., & Moster, M. (1990) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32537-x · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsuruda, J., Kortman, K., Bradley, W., Wheeler, D., Van Dalsem, W., & Bradley, T.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1987-07-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-171
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W1855810953
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiation effects on cerebral white matter: MR evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.149.1.165
- The paper
- Tsuruda, J., Kortman, K., Bradley, W., Wheeler, D., Van Dalsem, W., & Bradley, T. (1987). Radiation effects on cerebral white matter: MR evaluation. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.149.1.165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.