The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat
Abstract
Six patients were reviewed who had renal angiomyolipoma (1.2-4.0 cm) in which only minimal amounts of fat were evident on CT. The fat content of the lesion was appreciated because tissue attenuation measurements of small areas of low attenuation within the tumors were performed and because thin-section (5-mm) and nonenhanced CT scans were used. The fat content of the lesions could be identified on 10-mm sections in three cases but only on 5-mm sections in three others. In two cases, fat was seen only on the nonenhanced 5-mm thin sections. Careful sampling of low-density regions within the mass must be performed because a single region of interest over the entire tumor will produce an average attenuation in the soft-tissue range. The use of 5-mm thin sections and thin, nonenhanced CT sections increases spatial and density resolution and decreases susceptibility to partial-volume effects. In a correlative study, no areas of fat were detected in a review of 100 well-circumscribed (4.0 cm or smaller) renal cell carcinomas. Detecting the existence of fat in a renal lesion will establish the diagnosis of angiomyolipoma and is the only radiologic finding that can differentiate it from renal cell carcinoma. Thus, unnecessary surgery will be avoided in these cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tumours of the Kidney, Renal Pelvis and Ureter
Bennington, J. L., & Beckwith, J. B. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 454
The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values
Levi, C., Gray, J., McCullough, E., & Hattery, R. (1982) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.139.3.443 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Managing Incidental Findings on Abdominal CT: White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee
Berland, L. L., Silverman, S. G., Gore, R. M., Mayo-Smith, W. W., Megibow, A. J., Yee, J., Brink, J. A., Baker, M. E., Federle, M. P., Foley, W. D., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013 · Cited by 868
Self-citationContemporary Diagnosis and Management of Renal Angiomyolipoma
Nelson, C. P., & Sanda, M. G. (2002) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64440-0 · Cited by 420
Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Renal Angiomyolipoma
NELSON, C. P., & SANDA, M. G. (2002) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/00005392-200210010-00004 · Cited by 384
Jinzaki, M., Silverman, S. G., Akita, H., Nagashima, Y., Mikami, S., & Oya, M. (2014) · Abdominal Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0083-3 · Cited by 332
Costa, D. N., Pedrosa, I., McKenzie, C., Reeder, S. B., & Rofsky, N. M. (2008) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.07.3182 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Bosniak, M., Megibow, A., Hulnick, D., Horii, S., & Raghavendra, B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1988-09-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 497-501
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W1989755108
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.151.3.497
- The paper
- Bosniak, M., Megibow, A., Hulnick, D., Horii, S., & Raghavendra, B. (1988). CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.151.3.497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.