The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cystic pancreatic tumors: CT and sonographic assessment
Abstract
Thirty-five CT scans and 23 sonograms of 45 pathologically proved pancreatic cystic neoplasms (16 microcystic adenomas, 17 mucinous [macrocystic] cystadenomas, and 12 mucinous [macrocystic] cystadenocarcinomas) in 43 patients were retrospectively and blindly reviewed. Radiologic findings and their usefulness in differentiating microcystic from mucinous subtypes were assessed. The number of cysts within the tumors (more than six in microcystic adenomas and six or fewer in mucinous cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas) and the diameter of the majority of cysts within the tumor (less than or equal to 2 cm in microcystic adenomas and greater than 2 cm in mucinous tumors) were the most helpful radiologic findings in differentiating tumor types. Calcification was present in 38% of microcystic adenomas, 18% of mucinous cystadenomas, and 8% of mucinous cystadenocarcinomas by CT. Calcification was not definitely identified on any of the sonograms. A central scar was identified in only two (13%) of 16 microcystic adenomas. Blind retrospective review was often able to correctly classify tumors as either microcystic (CT, 93%; sonography, 78%) or mucinous (CT, 95%; sonography, 93%). All tumors with a typical appearance on either CT or sonography were categorized correctly. Cystic pancreatic tumors may be difficult to prospectively separate from other types of pancreatic cysts. Assuming a cystic neoplasm is present, it often can be classified correctly as microcystic or mucinous (macrocystic) by using the above criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pancreatic involvement in von Hippel–Lindau disease
Hammel, P. R., Vilgrain, V., Terris, B., Penfornis, A., Sauvanet, A., Correas, J., Chauveau, D., Balian, A., Beigelman, C., O'Toole, D., et al. (2000) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2000.18143 · Cited by 426
Cystic Pancreatic Lesions: A Simple Imaging-based Classification System for Guiding Management
Sahani, D. V., Kadavigere, R., Saokar, A., Fernandez-del Castillo, C., Brugge, W. R., & Hahn, P. F. (2005) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.256045161 · Cited by 375
Jais, B., Rebours, V, Malleo, G., Salvia, R., Fontana, M., Maggino, L., Bassi, C., Manfredi, R., Moran, R., Lennon, A. M., et al. (2016) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309638 · Cited by 372
Ahmad, N. A., Kochman, M. L., Brensinger, C., Brugge, W. R., Faigel, D. O., Gress, F. G., Kimmey, M. B., Nickl, N. J., Savides, T. J., Wallace, M. B., et al. (2003) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1067/mge.2003.298 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, C., Stephens, D., Charboneau, J., Carpenter, H., & Welch, T.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1988-12-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1133-1138
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2051628818
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cystic pancreatic tumors: CT and sonographic assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.151.6.1133
- The paper
- Johnson, C., Stephens, D., Charboneau, J., Carpenter, H., & Welch, T. (1988). Cystic pancreatic tumors: CT and sonographic assessment. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.151.6.1133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.