Cited by 173Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsAdrenal Hormones and DisordersMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Update on CT and MRI of adrenal nodules

Schieda, Nicola, Siegelman, Evan S.·2017·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to review the current role of CT and MRI for the characterization of adrenal nodules. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced CT and chemical-shift MRI have high specificity for lipid-rich adenomas. Dual-energy CT provides comparable to slightly lower sensitivity for the diagnosis of lipid-rich adenomas but may improve characterization of lipid-poor adenomas. Nonadenomas containing intracellular lipid pose an imaging challenge; however, nonadenomas that contain lipid may be potentially diagnosed using other imaging features. Multiphase adrenal washout CT can be used to differentiate lipid-poor adenomas from metastases but is limited for the diagnosis of hypervascular malignancies and pheochromocytoma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.16.17758

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Visual assessment of FDG activity has similar pooled sensitivity and specificity (91-92%) to quantitative analysis using adrenal to liver SUV ratio (89-91%) or SUVmax (85-91%).

    “Visual assessment of FDG activity within adrenal lesions compared to background (physiological) uptake in the liver or blood pool has similar pooled sensitivity and specificity (91-92%) to quantitative analysis using adrenal to liver standardized uptake value (SUV) ratio (89-91%) or maximum SUV (SUVmax) (85-91%) (309).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [309]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 173

Authors
Schieda, N., & Siegelman, E. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
2017-06
Volume
208
Issue
6
Pages
1206-1217
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2591468408
Cited by
173
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Roentgenology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
adrenal nodules, adrenal adenoma, adrenal metastasis, adrenal pheochromocytoma, dual-energy CT, chemical shift MRI, adrenal imaging
MeSH terms
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Humans, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review