The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sedation is frequently essential for successful MR imaging, and chloral hydrate is the most commonly used drug for this purpose in infants and children. Our experience with these patients suggested that this sedative is less effective in older children, even when administered in high doses. However, no prospective study comparing the efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation for children of different ages undergoing MR imaging has been reported. Accordingly, we performed a study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chloral hydrate sedation in children of various ages. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 300 infants and children, 1 month to 11 years old (mean, 3 years), who were given oral chloral hydrate, 100 mg/kg, for sedation before MR imaging. The maximum total dose administered was 2.5 g, which limited the study to children who weighed 25 kg or less. Sedation was considered successful when MR studies were completed and at least 95% of the images had little or no motion artifact. RESULTS: Sedation was successful in 273 (91%) of 300 children. It was unsuccessful in nine of the 203 children who were 48 months old or younger (96% success rate) and in 18 of the 97 children who were more than 48 months old (81% success rate). A single-tailed t-test showed that the children in whom sedation was unsuccessful were significantly older than those in whom it was successful to the .0005 level of significance. The failure rate increased steadily for children more than 48 months old. Several failures may also have resulted from lengthy examination times. Adverse reactions to chloral hydrate sedation included hyperactivity (6%), vomiting (4%), and mild respiratory depression (4%). No adverse reaction was severe enough to require hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The higher failure rate for chloral hydrate sedation in children more than 48 months old suggests that the patient's age is an important limitation to the usefulness of chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging. However, the low rate of adverse reactions makes chloral hydrate a safe drug for sedation of children undergoing MR imaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adverse Sedation Events in Pediatrics: Analysis of Medications Used for Sedation
Coté, C. J., Karl, H. W., Notterman, D. A., Weinberg, J. A., & McCloskey, C. (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.106.4.633 · Cited by 616
Cravero, J. P., Beach, M. L., Blike, G. T., Gallagher, S. M., & Hertzog, J. H. (2009) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e31818fc334 · Cited by 607
Sedation and Analgesia for Procedures in Children
Krauss, B., & Green, S. M. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200003303421306 · Cited by 465
Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Complex and Multifactorial Challenge
Kennedy, R. M. (2021) · Pediatric Sedation Outside of the Operating Room · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58406-1_22 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenberg, S. B., Faerber, E. N., Aspinall, C. L., & Adams, R. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 639-641
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2023825237
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352124
- The paper
- Greenberg, S. B., Faerber, E. N., Aspinall, C. L., & Adams, R. C. (1993). High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.