Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age.

Greenberg, S B, Faerber, E N, Aspinall, C L, Adams, R C·1993·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sedation is frequently essential for successful MR imaging, and chloral hydrate is the most commonly used drug for this purpose in infants and children. Our experience with these patients suggested that this sedative is less effective in older children, even when administered in high doses. However, no prospective study comparing the efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation for children of different ages undergoing MR imaging has been reported. Accordingly, we performed a study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chloral hydrate sedation in children of various ages. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 300 infants and children, 1 month to 11 years old (mean, 3 years), who were given oral chloral hydrate, 100 mg/kg, for sedation before MR imaging. The maximum total dose administered was 2.5 g, which limited the study to children who weighed 25 kg or less. Sedation was considered successful when MR studies were completed and at least 95% of the images had little or no motion artifact. RESULTS: Sedation was successful in 273 (91%) of 300 children. It was unsuccessful in nine of the 203 children who were 48 months old or younger (96% success rate) and in 18 of the 97 children who were more than 48 months old (81% success rate). A single-tailed t-test showed that the children in whom sedation was unsuccessful were significantly older than those in whom it was successful to the .0005 level of significance. The failure rate increased steadily for children more than 48 months old. Several failures may also have resulted from lengthy examination times. Adverse reactions to chloral hydrate sedation included hyperactivity (6%), vomiting (4%), and mild respiratory depression (4%). No adverse reaction was severe enough to require hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The higher failure rate for chloral hydrate sedation in children more than 48 months old suggests that the patient's age is an important limitation to the usefulness of chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging. However, the low rate of adverse reactions makes chloral hydrate a safe drug for sedation of children undergoing MR imaging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352124

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Greenberg, S. B., Faerber, E. N., Aspinall, C. L., & Adams, R. C.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
1993-09
Volume
161
Issue
3
Pages
639-641
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2023825237
Cited by
182
References
0
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352124
The paper
Greenberg, S. B., Faerber, E. N., Aspinall, C. L., & Adams, R. C. (1993). High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352124

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.