The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A preliminary study was done to prospectively compare fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo (3D SPGR) MR imaging with standard MR imaging for detection of defects in the hyaline cartilage of the knee, using arthroscopy as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 43 consecutive patients referred by two orthopedic surgeons for MR imaging of the knee. Twelve had arthroscopic correlation; they formed the basis of our study. Hyaline cartilage was imaged with a fat-suppressed 3D SPGR sequence with previously determined optimal imaging parameters. Our standard MR imaging study consisted of two-dimensional coronal T1-weighted spin-echo, sagittal dual-echo T2-weighted spin-echo, and axial multiplanar gradient-echo sequences. With arthroscopy as the reference standard, sensitivity and specificity of fat-suppressed 3D SPGR and standard MR images for detecting cartilage tears were determined by articular surface (eight surfaces in each patient: medial and lateral patellar facets, trochlear facets, femoral condyles, and tibial plateaus). Statistically significant differences in sensitivity and specificity were determined. RESULTS: Arthroscopy showed 15 cartilage defects in seven patients. The fat-suppressed 3D SPGR images had higher sensitivity (93%) than the standard MR images (53%, p = .03). Specificity was 94% for the fat-suppressed 3D SPGR images compared with 93% for the standard MR images (p > .05). The five false-positive articular surfaces on fat-suppressed 3D SPGR images were from focal signal change within the substance of the cartilage without a contour defect. Smoothly contoured thinning and loss of the trilaminar appearance of the hyaline cartilage at the lateral femoral notch was shown in all subjects and was considered a normal finding. CONCLUSION: Fat-suppressed 3D SPGR imaging is more sensitive than standard MR imaging for the detection of abnormalities of the hyaline cartilage in the knee. Routine use of this technique may strengthen the role of MR imaging for noninvasive evaluation of internal derangements of the knee.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crema, M. D., Roemer, F. W., Marra, M. D., Burstein, D., Gold, G. E., Eckstein, F., Baum, T., Mosher, T. J., Carrino, J. A., & Guermazi, A. (2011) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.311105084 · Cited by 448
Cohen, Z. A., McCarthy, D. M., Kwak, S. D., Legrand, P., Fogarasi, F., Ciaccio, E. J., & Ateshian, G. A. (1999) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1053/joca.1998.0165 · Cited by 353
Advances in Imaging of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Roemer, F. W., Crema, M. D., Trattnig, S., & Guermazi, A. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.11101359 · Cited by 220
Quatman, C. E., Hettrich, C. M., Schmitt, L. C., & Spindler, K. P. (2011) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546511407612 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Disler, D. G., McCauley, T. R., Wirth, C. R., & Fuchs, M. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 377-382
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W1982552475
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618561
- The paper
- Disler, D. G., McCauley, T. R., Wirth, C. R., & Fuchs, M. D. (1995). Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.