Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.

Disler, D G, McCauley, T R, Wirth, C R, Fuchs, M D·1995·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A preliminary study was done to prospectively compare fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo (3D SPGR) MR imaging with standard MR imaging for detection of defects in the hyaline cartilage of the knee, using arthroscopy as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 43 consecutive patients referred by two orthopedic surgeons for MR imaging of the knee. Twelve had arthroscopic correlation; they formed the basis of our study. Hyaline cartilage was imaged with a fat-suppressed 3D SPGR sequence with previously determined optimal imaging parameters. Our standard MR imaging study consisted of two-dimensional coronal T1-weighted spin-echo, sagittal dual-echo T2-weighted spin-echo, and axial multiplanar gradient-echo sequences. With arthroscopy as the reference standard, sensitivity and specificity of fat-suppressed 3D SPGR and standard MR images for detecting cartilage tears were determined by articular surface (eight surfaces in each patient: medial and lateral patellar facets, trochlear facets, femoral condyles, and tibial plateaus). Statistically significant differences in sensitivity and specificity were determined. RESULTS: Arthroscopy showed 15 cartilage defects in seven patients. The fat-suppressed 3D SPGR images had higher sensitivity (93%) than the standard MR images (53%, p = .03). Specificity was 94% for the fat-suppressed 3D SPGR images compared with 93% for the standard MR images (p > .05). The five false-positive articular surfaces on fat-suppressed 3D SPGR images were from focal signal change within the substance of the cartilage without a contour defect. Smoothly contoured thinning and loss of the trilaminar appearance of the hyaline cartilage at the lateral femoral notch was shown in all subjects and was considered a normal finding. CONCLUSION: Fat-suppressed 3D SPGR imaging is more sensitive than standard MR imaging for the detection of abnormalities of the hyaline cartilage in the knee. Routine use of this technique may strengthen the role of MR imaging for noninvasive evaluation of internal derangements of the knee.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618561

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Disler, D. G., McCauley, T. R., Wirth, C. R., & Fuchs, M. D.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
1995-08
Volume
165
Issue
2
Pages
377-382
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W1982552475
Cited by
251
References
0
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618561
The paper
Disler, D. G., McCauley, T. R., Wirth, C. R., & Fuchs, M. D. (1995). Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618561

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.