The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CT of Primary Cystic Pancreatic Neoplasms: Can CT be Used for Patient Triage and Treatment?
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether CT can be used to distinguish serous cystadenomas from mucinous cystadenomas or cystadenocarcinomas of the pancreas and play an enhanced role in patient triage and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A blinded retrospective analysis of CT scans from 50 patients with pathologically proven primary cystic pancreatic neoplasms was performed independently by three radiologists. Using classic CT criteria as reported in the literature, each tumor was categorized as definitely serous, mucinous, or indeterminate. Tumor location, size, presence of calcification, and size of largest cyst were recorded. Data for each reviewer were analyzed independently. Consensus data were then subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The ability of our reviewers to diagnose serous neoplasms ranged from 23% to 41%. Eight mucinous neoplasms were mistaken for serous tumors by two of the three reviewers. When consensus between at least two of the three reviewers was used for diagnosis, 27% of serous neoplasms were correctly diagnosed and all of the mucinous tumors were correctly identified as uncertain or mucinous, yielding the same clinical end point. For multivariate logistic regression analysis, a cyst smaller than 2 cm had a statistically significant association (p = 0.005) with serous tumors, and the presence of peripheral tumoral calcification had a statistically significant association (p = 0.01) with mucinous tumors. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the CT appearance of serous and mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas, making CT an insensitive tool for differentiating these tumors. All tumors with peripheral calcifications were identified as mucinous neoplasms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms
The European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316027 · Cited by 1,417
Cystic Pancreatic Neoplasms: Observe or Operate
Spinelli, K. S., Fromwiller, T. E., Daniel, R. A., Kiely, J. M., Nakeeb, A., Komorowski, R. A., Wilson, S. D., & Pitt, H. A. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000124299.57430.ce · Cited by 537
Cystic Pancreatic Lesions: A Simple Imaging-based Classification System for Guiding Management
Sahani, D. V., Kadavigere, R., Saokar, A., Fernandez-del Castillo, C., Brugge, W. R., & Hahn, P. F. (2005) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.256045161 · Cited by 375
Jais, B., Rebours, V, Malleo, G., Salvia, R., Fontana, M., Maggino, L., Bassi, C., Manfredi, R., Moran, R., Lennon, A. M., et al. (2016) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309638 · Cited by 372
Ahmad, N. A., Kochman, M. L., Brensinger, C., Brugge, W. R., Faigel, D. O., Gress, F. G., Kimmey, M. B., Nickl, N. J., Savides, T. J., Wallace, M. B., et al. (2003) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1067/mge.2003.298 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Curry, C. A., Eng, J., Horton, K. M., Urban, B., Siegelman, S., Kuszyk, B. S., & Fishman, E. K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-103
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2098657558
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CT of Primary Cystic Pancreatic Neoplasms: Can CT be Used for Patient Triage and Treatment? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750099
- The paper
- Curry, C. A., Eng, J., Horton, K. M., Urban, B., Siegelman, S., Kuszyk, B. S., & Fishman, E. K. (2000). CT of Primary Cystic Pancreatic Neoplasms: Can CT be Used for Patient Triage and Treatment? American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.