Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 478

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adverse Events During Radiofrequency Treatment of 582 Hepatic Tumors

de Baère, Thierry, Risse, Olivier, Kuoch, Viseth, Dromain, Clarisse, Sengel, Christophe, Smayra, Tarek, Din, Mostafa Gamal El, Letoublon, Christian, Elias, Dominique·2003·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We describe the rates and potential risk factors of complications of radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Over a 5-year period, 312 patients underwent 350 sessions of radiofrequency ablation (124 intraoperative and 226 percutaneous) for treatment of 582 liver tumors including 115 hepatocellular carcinomas and 467 metastatic tumors. The chi-square test was used for a group-to-group comparison of the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-seven (10.6%) adverse events and five (1.4%) deaths were related to radiofrequency treatment. The deaths were caused by liver insufficiency (n = 1), colon perforation (n = 1), and portal vein thrombosis (n = 3). Portal vein thrombosis was significantly (p < 0.00001) more frequent in cirrhotic livers (2/5) than in noncirrhotic livers (0/54) after intraoperative radiofrequency ablation performed during a Pringle maneuver. Liver abscess (n = 7) was the most common complication. Abscess occurred significantly (p < 0.00001) more frequently in patients bearing a bilioenteric anastomosis (3/3) than in other patients (4/223). We encountered five pleural effusions, five skin burns, four hypoxemias, three pneumothoraces, two small subcapsular hematomas, one acute renal insufficiency, one hemoperitoneum, and one needle-tract seeding. The 6.3% of minor complications did not require specific treatment or a prolonged hospital stay. Among the 5.7% major complications, 3.7% required less than 5 days of hospitalization for treatment or surveillance and 2% required more than 5 days for treatment. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors is a well-tolerated technique, but caution should be exercised when treating patients with a bilioenteric anastomosis, and radiofrequency ablation during vascular occlusion in cirrhotic livers should be avoided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810695

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
de Baère, T., Risse, O., Kuoch, V., Dromain, C., Sengel, C., Smayra, T., Din, M. G. E., Letoublon, C., & Elias, D.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
2003-09
Volume
181
Issue
3
Pages
695-700
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2165268128
Cited by
478
References
12
FWCI
22.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adverse Events During Radiofrequency Treatment of 582 Hepatic Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810695
The paper
de Baère, T., Risse, O., Kuoch, V., Dromain, C., Sengel, C., Smayra, T., Din, M. G. E., Letoublon, C., & Elias, D. (2003). Adverse Events During Radiofrequency Treatment of 582 Hepatic Tumors. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810695

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.