Cited by 166Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments

Low-Density Pheochromocytoma on CT:A Mimicker of Adrenal Adenoma

Open access
Blake, Michael A., Krishnamoorthy, Saravanan K., Boland, Giles W., Sweeney, Ann T., Pitman, Martha B., Harisinghani, Mukesh, Mueller, Peter R., Hahn, Peter F.·2003·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Attenuation values on CT of less than 10 H are considered characteristic of adrenal adenomas. Adrenal pheochromocytomas can infrequently contain fat that could result in low attenuation on CT. The purpose of our study was to determine if pheochromocytomas could be confused with adenomas by virtue of their attenuation values on unenhanced CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT attenuation and size of nine adrenal nodules producing pheochromocytoma syndrome were measured on unenhanced CT in nine patients. For five patients who received IV contrast material, washout profiles were also calculated. RESULTS: Two of the nine patients had adrenal lesions with attenuation values of less than 10 H; one had a pheochromocytoma with an attentuation of 9.0 H, and the other had a medullary hyperplasia with an attenuation of 1.8 H. These two nodules showed evidence of microscopic fat at histologic examination. No macroscopic fat was seen on the CT scans. The remaining seven patients had lesions with attenuation values exceeding 10 H (mean value, 25.6 H; range, 1.8-41 H). Mean diameter of the nine tumors (including the hyperplastic nodule) was 3.2 cm (range, 0.8-6.7 cm; SD, +/- 2.3 cm). The two low-attenuation lesions also mimicked adenomas by displaying more than 60% contrast washout on 10-min-delayed contrast-enhanced scans, unlike the other three pheochromocytomas for which we had washout data. CONCLUSION: On CT, pheochromocytomas may have attenuation values less than 10 H and also may display more than 60% washout of contrast agents on delayed scanning. Adrenal pheochromocytomas should be included with adenomas in the differential diagnosis both for masses with low attenuation on unenhanced CT and for lesions exhibiting a high percentage of contrast washout.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811663

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mean Hounsfield unit scores for pheochromocytoma are 30 to 35, with only 0.5% of pheochromocytomas having an unenhanced CT attenuation of 10 HU or less.

    “Mean HU scores for pheochromocytoma are 30 to 35 (197) with only 0.5% of pheochromocytoma having an unenhanced CT attenuation of ≤10 HU (97,197,198).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [198]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 166

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Boland GWL, Hahn PF, Peña C, Mueller PR. Ad- renal masses: characterization with delayed con- trast-enhanced CT. Radiology 1997;202:693-696
  2. Bravo EL, Gifford RW. Current concepts: pheo- chromocytoma-diagnosis, localization and man- agement. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1298-1303
  3. Melicow MM. One hundred cases of pheochro- mocytoma at the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, 1926-76: a clinicopathological analysis. Cancer 1977;40:1977-1984
  4. Ramsay JA, Asa SL, van Nostrand AW, Hassaram ST, de Harven EP. Lipid degeneration in pheo- chromocytomas mimicking adrenal cortical tu- mors. Am J Surg Pathol 1987;11:480-486
  5. Otal P, Escourrou G, Mazerolles C, et al. Imaging fea- tures of uncommon adrenal masses with histopatho- logic correlation. RadioGraphics 1999;19:569-581

Authors
Blake, M. A., Krishnamoorthy, S. K., Boland, G. W., Sweeney, A. T., Pitman, M. B., Harisinghani, M., Mueller, P. R., & Hahn, P. F.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • St. Elizabeth's Medical Center (US)
  • Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., White 270, Boston, MA 02114.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
2003-12
Volume
181
Issue
6
Pages
1663-1668
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W1975377002
Cited by
166
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Roentgenology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
pheochromocytoma, adrenal adenoma, adrenal nodules, CT attenuation, contrast washout, differential diagnosis, adrenal medullary hyperplasia, unenhanced CT
MeSH terms
Adenoma, Adolescent, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adrenal Medulla, Adult, Aged, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Hyperplasia, Male, Middle Aged, Pheochromocytoma, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review