Randomized Controlled Trials
Abstract
Randomized Controlled TrialsHarald O. Stolberg1, Geoffrey Norman2 and Isabelle Trop3Audio Available | Share
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Random allocation helps to minimize biases and ensures that the groups are comparable at the start of the study.
“This random allocation helps to minimize biases and ensures that the groups are comparable at the start of the study.”
From Empowering ChatGPT with Guidance Mechanism in Blended Learning: Effect of Self-Regulated Learning, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, and Knowledge Construction (2024) · cites this paper as Stolberg et al., 2004
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668 · see citing works
Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement
Begg, C. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030 · Cited by 3,127 · see citing works
Freiman, J. A., Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H., & Kuebler, R. R. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197809282991304 · Cited by 1,628 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mdege, N. D., Man, M.-S., Taylor (nee Brown), C. A., & Torgerson, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.003 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
“The outcomes of these groups are then compared to determine the effectiveness of the intervention (Stolberg et al., 2004).”
BackgroundGetting Off the “Gold Standard”: Randomized Controlled Trials and Education Research
Sullivan, G. M. (2011) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-11-00147.1 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Bigna, J. J. R., Um, L. N., & Nansseu, J. R. N. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0356-8 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
How to Design AI-Driven Clinical Trials in Nuclear Medicine
Delso, G., Cirillo, D., Kaggie, J. D., Valencia, A., Metser, U., & Veit-Haibach, P. (2021) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.09.003 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Implementation salvage experiences from the Melbourne diabetes prevention study
Dunbar, J., Hernan, A., Janus, E., Davis-Lameloise, N., Asproloupos, D., O’Reilly, S., Timoshanko, A., Stewart, E., Bennett, C. M., Johnson, G., et al. (2012) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-806 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stolberg, H. O., Norman, G., & Trop, I.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University Medical Centre (CA)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Hôpital Saint-Luc (CA)
- ORCID
- Trop, Isabelle
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1539-1544
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2107602010
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 0.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Roentgenology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
- Keywords
- randomized controlled trials, radiology research, evidence-based medicine, trial design
- MeSH terms
- Ethics, Medical, Humans, Radiology, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
