Cited by 5Advanced X-ray and CT ImagingBone health and osteoporosis researchMedical Imaging and Analysis

Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Topograms From a Clinical Photon-Counting Detector CT System: A Phantom Evaluation

Moser, Lukas J., Pitteloud, Janique, Mergen, Victor, Frey, Diana, Nowak, Tristan, Distler, Oliver, Eberhard, Matthias, Alkadhi, Hatem·2024·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

Bone mineral density assessments in a spine phantom had lower errors by spectral topograms from a clinical photon-counting detector CT scanner than by a DXA system. Bone mineral density assessments by PCD CT also had high reproducibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.23.30347

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A previous experimental study with spectral localizer radiographs from PCD-CT using the European Spine Phantom showed that spectral localizer radiographs were more accurate than DXA at higher bone density.

    “A previous experimental study with spectral localizer radiographs from PCD-CT using the established European Spine Phantom21 showed that spectral localizer radiographs were more accurate that DXA at higher bone density.13”
  • Two phantom studies using a clinically approved PCD-CT scanner confirmed these initial observations and showed accurate results in regard to aBMD quantification as compared with phantom specifications and with the clinical reference standard DXA.

    “More recently, 2 phantom studies using a clinically approved PCD-CT scanner confirmed these initial observations and showed accurate results in regard to aBMD quantification as compared with phantom specifications and with the clinical reference standard DXA.12,13”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moser, L. J., Pitteloud, J., Mergen, V., Frey, D., Nowak, T., Distler, O., Eberhard, M., & Alkadhi, H.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Siemens Healthineers (Germany) (DE)
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
2024-02
Volume
222
Issue
2
Pages
e2330347-e2330347
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W4388491191
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Roentgenology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
bone mineral density, photon-counting CT, spine phantom, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparison, measurement reproducibility, bone densitometry
MeSH terms
Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Bone Density, Photons, Phantoms, Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review