Artificial intelligence for low-dose CT lung cancer screening: Comparison of utilization scenarios
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using AI as a prescreener, where radiologists only review AI-positive scans, can reduce workload and maintain sensitivity, while AI as an assistant or backup may increase recall rates but also false positives and interpretation time.
“Implementation scenarios vary: using AI as a prescreener (where radiologists only review AI-positive scans) can reduce workload and maintain sensitivity, while AI as an assistant or backup may increase recall rates but also false positives and interpretation time [17].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncologic Thoracic Surgery: Clinical Decision Support and Emerging Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial
de Koning, H. J., van der Aalst, C. M., de Jong, P. A., Scholten, E. T., Nackaerts, K., Heuvelmans, M. A., Lammers, J.-W. J., Weenink, C., Yousaf-Khan, U., Horeweg, N., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1911793 · Cited by 3,624 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petrella, F., & Rizzo, S. (2026) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers18020246 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lee, M., Hwang, E. J., Lee, J. H., Nam, J. G., Lim, W. H., Park, H., Park, C. M., Choi, H., Park, J., & Goo, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 2025-07
- Volume
- 225
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
