Cited by 3Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationGeotechnical and construction materials studiesRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

Impact of recycled concrete aggregate particle size on the strength of soil mixtures for subgrade improvement

Open access
Ho, Thi Kim Thoa, Le, Hoang Khanh·2025·CTU Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development

Abstract

Subgrade improvement applications have extensively investigated the financial and ecological benefits of utilizing recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) waste. This solution has been widely studied in recent decades. This study presents the findings of the relationship between different sizes of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) particles and certain properties of SRCA blends by adding cement. The test results showed that adding RCA with cement to unstabilized soil significantly improved its compressive strength behavior. Incorporating RCA into the soil mixture can more than double its compressive strength. Integrating larger RCA particle sizes into unstabilized soil decreased the optimum moisture content (OMC) while increasing the maximum dry density (MDD). Conversely, using finer RCA particle sizes in soil mixtures increased the compressive strength compared to larger RCA particles. This blend of RCA-stabilized expansive soil is suitable for subgrade improvement applications, such as building low-traffic volume roads and ensuring embankment stability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22144/ctujoisd.2025.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 3

Authors
Ho, T. K. T., & Le, H. K.
Affiliations
Can Tho University (VN)
Venue
CTU Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development
Published
2025-03-04
Volume
17
Issue
Special issue: ETMD
Pages
102-112
ISSN
  • 2588-1418 (ISSN-L)
  • 2815-6412
OpenAlex
W4408466740
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CTU Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Keywords
recycled concrete aggregate, particle size, soil stabilization, subgrade improvement, compressive strength, optimum moisture content, maximum dry density, expansive soil, cement stabilization, waste recycling, embankment stability, low-volume roads

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review