Cited by 38Academic integrity and plagiarismAcademic Writing and PublishingPublishing and Scholarly Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Memahami dan Mencegah Perilaku Plagiarisme dalam Menulis Karya Ilmiah

Open access
Shadiqi, Muhammad Abdan·2019·Buletin Psikologi

Abstract

Plagiarism is a misconduct act and a scourge for science. Plagiarism perpetrators steal other author's work without citing the original references. Psychology is one of the most vulnerable sciences with plagiarism and must give more attention to this issue. Several types of plagiarism can be distinguished to the plagiarism motivation (intentional, unintentional, and inadvertent), how to do plagiarism (patchwriting, inappropriate paraphrasing, and summaries) and self-plagiarism (text recycling, redundant or duplicate publication, salami-slicing or data fragmentation). There are several reasons to do plagiarism, such as ease to get information via the internet, pressure on academic tasks, bad writing skill, hurry to write under pressure, lack of understanding how to rewrite the original reference, a misconception to understanding self-plagiarism, and habitual plagiarists. This article also presents steps to avoid plagiarism, such as avoiding "intellectual theft", doing good writing (citation and paraphrasing), and testing the similarity test (plagiarism detection service).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.43058

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Burdine, L. K., de Castro Maymone, M. B., & Vashi, N. A. (2018). Text recycling: Self-plagiarism in scientific writing. International Journal of Women's Dermatology, 5(2), 134-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.10.002 Committee on Publication Ethics. (n.d.). Core practices. Diunduh dari https://publicationethics.org/core- practices · DOI
  2. Debnath, J. (2016). Plagiarism: A silent epidemic in scientific writing - Reasons, recognition and remedies. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 72(2), 164-167. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.03.010 · DOI
  3. Elander, J., Pittam, G., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. (2010). Evaluation of an intervention to help students avoid unintentional plagiarism by improving their authorial identity, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 157-171. doi: 10.1080/02602930802687745 · DOI
  4. Elston, D. M. (in press). Duplicate publication. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.015 · DOI
  5. Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2019). The extent and causes of academic text recycling or "self- plagiarism." Research Policy, 48(2), 492- 502. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.004 · DOI
  6. Jirge, P. R. (2017). Preparing and publishing a scientific manuscript. Journal of Human Reproductive Science, 10(1), 3.
  7. Marshall, L., & Rowland, F. (1998). A guide to learning independently, 3rd Edition. Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman.
  8. Mohapatra, S., & Samal, L. (2014). The ethics of self-plagiarism. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 12(1), 147-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.10.005 · DOI
  9. Moskovitz, C. (2017). Text recycling in health sciences research literature: A rhetorical perspective. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2(1), 1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0025-z · DOI
  10. Pandita, R., & Singh, S. (2017). Self- citations, a trend prevalent across subject disciplines at the global level: an overview. Collection Building, 36(3), 115-126. doi: 10.1108/CB-03-2017-0008 · DOI
  11. Park, C. (2003). In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students-- literature and lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 37-41. doi: 10.1080/02602930301677 · DOI
  12. Pastor, J. C. (2018). Plagiarism in publications. Archivos de La Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia, 93(12), 571- 572. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2018.08.009 · DOI
  13. Rachmah, D. N. (2018). Pengumuman editor: Penarikan satu naskah pada Vol. 5 No. 1 April 2018. Jurnal Ecopsy, 5(2), 110. Diunduh dari https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journal/index.ph p/ecopsy/article/view/5411
  14. Shadiqi, M. A., Muluk, H., & Milla, M. N. (2018). Experiment replication: A proposed solution for developing psychological research in Indonesia. Anima Indonesian Psychological Journal, 33(4), 213-230. doi: 10.24123/aipj.v33i4.1795 · DOI
  15. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2009). Plagiarism, the Internet, and student learning: Improving academic integrity. New York: Routledge.
  16. The Office of Research Integrity. (1994). ORI policy on plagiarism. ORI Newsletter, 3(1), 5-6. Retrieved from http://ori.hhs.gov/ori-policy- plagiarism Turnitin.com. (2016a). Melania Trump trumped by plagiarism? Under- standing plagiarism to avoid controversy. Retrieved December 30, 2018, from Turnitin.com website: https://www.turnitin.com/blog/melani a-trump-trumped-by-plagiarism Turnitin.com. (2016b). The plagiarism spectrum. Retrieved January 26, 2019, from https://www.turnitin.com/static/plagia rism-spectrum/
  17. Wibowo, A. (2012). Mencegah dan menanggulangi plagiarisme di dunia pendidikan. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional, 6(5), 195-200. doi: 10.21109/kesmas.v6i5. · DOI
  18. Zalnur, M. (2012). Plagiarisme di kalangan mahasiswa dalam membuat tugas- tugas perkuliahan pada Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Imam Bonjol Padang. AL-Ta'Lim, 19(1), 55-66. doi: 10.15548/jt.v19i1.6 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shadiqi, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Indonesia (ID)
Corresponding author
Shadiqi, Muhammad Abdan
Venue
Buletin Psikologi
Published
2019-06-14
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
30
ISSN
  • 0854-7106 (ISSN-L)
  • 2528-5858
OpenAlex
W2949646037
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Buletin Psikologi (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Jurnal Perlindungan Tanaman Indonesia (Universitas Gadjah Mada) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
plagiarism, academic misconduct, psychology research, plagiarism avoidance, self-plagiarism, paraphrase, citation, similarity checking, plagiarism detection, writing skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review