The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Setting Research Priorities for Patients on or Nearing Dialysis
Open accessAbstract
With increasing emphasis among health care providers and funders on patient-centered care, it follows that patients and their caregivers should be included when priorities for research are being established. This study sought to identify the most important unanswered questions about the management of kidney failure from the perspective of adult patients on or nearing dialysis, their caregivers, and the health care professionals who care for these patients. Research uncertainties were identified through a national Canadian survey of adult patients on or nearing dialysis, their caregivers, and health care professionals. Uncertainties were refined by a steering committee that included patients, caregivers, researchers, and clinicians to assemble a short-list of the top 30 uncertainties. Thirty-four people (11 patients; five caregivers; eight physicians; six nurses; and one social worker, pharmacist, physiotherapist, and dietitian each) from across Canada subsequently participated in a workshop to determine the top 10 research questions. In total, 1570 usable research uncertainties were received from 317 respondents to the survey. Among these, 259 unique uncertainties were identified; after ranking, these were reduced to a short-list of 30 uncertainties. During the in-person workshop, the top 10 research uncertainties were identified, which included questions about enhanced communication among patients and providers, dialysis modality options, itching, access to kidney transplantation, heart health, dietary restrictions, depression, and vascular access. These can be used alongside the results of other research priority-setting exercises to guide researchers in designing future studies and inform health care funders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Baker, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1192 · Cited by 10,736
Leavitt, M. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 1,862
The Number, Quality, and Coverage of Randomized Controlled Trials in Nephrology
Strippoli, G. F. M., Craig, J. C., & Schena, F. P. (2004) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1097/01.asn.0000100125.21491.46 · Cited by 343
Liem, Y. S., Bosch, J. L., & Hunink, M. G. M. (2008) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00308.x · Cited by 208
Patients' priorities for health research: focus group study of patients with chronic kidney disease
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., Carter, S. M., Hall, B. M., Harris, D. C., Walker, R. G., Hawley, C. M., Chadban, S., & Craig, J. C. (2008) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn207 · Cited by 152
Murray, M. A., Brunier, G., Chung, J. O., Craig, L. A., Mills, C., Thomas, A., & Stacey, D. (2009) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.010 · Cited by 145
Batchelor, J., Ridd, M. J., Clarke, T., Ahmed, A. I., Cox, M., Crowe, S., Howard, M., Lawton, S., McPhee, M., Rani, A., et al. (2012) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.12040 · Cited by 127
Setting research priorities for Type 1 diabetes
Gadsby, R., Snow, R., Daly, A., Crowe, S., Matyka, K. A., Hall, B., & Petrie, J. R. (2012) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03755.x · Cited by 68
Schipper, K., & Abma, T. (2011) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfq833 · Cited by 65
Lophatananon, A., Tyndale‐Biscoe, S., Malcolm, E., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10609.x · Cited by 39
Cited by
Davison, S. N., Levin, A., Moss, A. H., Jha, V., Brown, E. A., Brennan, F., Murtagh, F. E. M., Naicker, S., Germain, M. J., O'Donoghue, D. J., et al. (2015) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.2015.110 · Cited by 580
Palmer, S. C., Natale, P., Ruospo, M., Saglimbene, V. M., Rabindranath, K. S., Craig, J. C., & Strippoli, G. F. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004541.pub3 · Cited by 96
Dawson, J., Campbell, K. L., Craig, J. C., Tong, A., Teixeira-Pinto, A., Brown, M. A., Howard, K., Howell, M., Khalid, R., Sud, K., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.11.015 · Cited by 49
Grant, A., Crane, M., Laupacis, A., Griffiths, A., Burnett, D., Hood, A., Kluthe, C., Maghera, M., Mann, M., Mansi, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000002396 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Manns, B., Hemmelgarn, B., Lillie, E., Dip, S. C. P. G., Cyr, A., Gladish, M., Large, C., Silverman, H., Toth, B., Wolfs, W., & Laupacis, A.
- Venue
- Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1813-1821
- ISSN
- 1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978013793
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 18.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Setting Research Priorities for Patients on or Nearing Dialysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2215/cjn.01610214
- The paper
- Manns, B., Hemmelgarn, B., Lillie, E., Dip, S. C. P. G., Cyr, A., Gladish, M., Large, C., Silverman, H., Toth, B., Wolfs, W., & Laupacis, A. (2014). Setting Research Priorities for Patients on or Nearing Dialysis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.01610214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
