The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Home Blood Pressures Are of Greater Prognostic Value than Hemodialysis Unit Recordings
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although ambulatory BP recordings are found to be superior to dialysis unit recordings in predicting outcomes, ambulatory BP are difficult to obtain in the day-to-day treatment of hemodialysis patients. Home BP agree well with ambulatory BP, but the prognostic significance of home BP recordings is unknown in hemodialysis patients. This study ascertained the role of home BP in predicting all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 150 patients who were on chronic hemodialysis dialyzing at four university-affiliated units. BP was self-measured at home for 1 wk, for an interdialytic interval by ambulatory recording, and by "routine" and standardized methods in the dialysis unit for 2 wk. Patients were followed for a median of 24 mo to assess the end points of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: Cardiovascular death occurred in 26 (17%) patients and death in 46 (31%) patients. A 1-SD increase in systolic BP increased the risk for death by 1.35 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.84) and in diastolic BP by 1.40 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.93) for home BP and between 0.97 to 1.19 (P > 0.20) for all-cause mortality for dialysis unit BP recording. A dose-response relationship between increasing quartiles of home BP and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Self-measured systolic BP of 125 to 145 mmHg and of 115 to 125 mmHg by ambulatory BP is associated with the best prognosis in hemodialysis patients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Patients with CKD on haemodialysis are profoundly different from patients with CKD who are not on dialysis; this is so because of varying states of volume excess among patients and volume accumulation in the interdialytic period [204–206].”
Citations
Cites
Agarwal, R., Peixoto, A. J., Santos, S. F. F., & Zoccali, C. (2006) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.01891105 · Cited by 245
Self-citationAgarwal, R., & Andersen, M. J. (2006) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5000081 · Cited by 184
Self-citationHome blood pressure monitoring improves the diagnosis of hypertension in hemodialysis patients
Agarwal, R., Andersen, M. J., Bishu, K., & Saha, C. (2006) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5000145 · Cited by 175
Self-citationHome Blood Pressure Monitoring in CKD
Andersen, M. J., Khawandi, W., & Agarwal, R. (2005) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.02.015 · Cited by 123
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ogihara, T., Kikuchi, K. M., Matsuoka, H., Fujita, T., Higaki, J., Horiuchi, M., Imai, Y., Imaizumi, T., Ito, S., Iwao, H., et al. (2014) · Hypertension Research · doi:10.1038/hr.2014.68 · Cited by 1,384
Cardiac Disease Evaluation and Management Among Kidney and Liver Transplantation Candidates
Lentine, K. L., Costa, S. P., Weir, M. R., Robb, J. F., Fleisher, L. A., Kasiske, B. L., Carithers, R. L., Ragosta, M., Bolton, K., Auerbach, A. D., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31823eb07a · Cited by 322
Macdougall, I. C., Bircher, A. J., Eckardt, K., Obrador, G. T., Pollock, C. A., Stenvinkel, P., Swinkels, D. W., Wanner, C., Weiß, G., Chertow, G. M., et al. (2016) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2015.10.002 · Cited by 489
Blood Pressure and Mortality Among Hemodialysis Patients
Agarwal, R. (2010) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.144899 · Cited by 274
Self-citationFlythe, J. E., Chang, T. I., Gallagher, M., Lindley, E. J., Madero, M., Sarafidis, P. A., Unruh, M. L., Wang, A. Y.-M., Weiner, D. E., Cheung, M., et al. (2020) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.01.046 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Alborzi, P., Patel, N., & Agarwal, R.
- Affiliations
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Agarwal, Rajiv
- ORCID
- Agarwal, Rajiv
- Venue
- Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1228-1234
- ISSN
- 1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128457806
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5t32dk062711-05)
- U.S. Public Health Service (5R01-063020)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (5T32DK062711)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Keywords
- home blood pressure, hemodialysis, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, prognostic value, self-measured blood pressure, interdialytic interval, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure Determination, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Self Care, Cohort Studies, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review